• Claire Seydoux, Michael Medinger, Sabine Gerull, Joerg Halter, Dominik Heim, Yves Chalandon, Stavroula Masouridi Levrat, Urs Schanz, Gayathri Nair, Marc Ansari, Patrick Simon, Jakob R Passweg, and Nathan Cantoni.
• Divisions of Hematology and Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
• Ann. Hematol. 2021 Jan 1; 100 (1): 209-216.

AbstractBusulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy) is a frequently used myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Theoretical considerations and pharmacological data indicate that application of busulfan prior to subsequent cyclophosphamide (BuCy) may trigger liver toxicity. Reversing the order of application to cyclophosphamide-busulfan (CyBu) might be preferable, a hypothesis supported by animal data and retrospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to determine impact of order of application of Bu and Cy before allo-HCT in 70 patients with hematological malignancy, 33 patients received BuCy and 37 CyBu for conditioning. In the short term, there were minimal differences in liver toxicity favoring CyBu over BuCy, significant only for alanine amino transferase at day 30 (p = 0.03). With longer follow-up at 4 years, non-relapse mortality (6% versus 27%, p = 0.05) was lower and survival (63% versus 43%, p = 0.06) was higher with CyBu compared to BuCy. Other outcomes, such as engraftment (p = 0.21), acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (p = 0.40; 0.36), and relapse (p = 0.79), were similar in both groups. We prospectively show evidence that the order of application of Cy and Bu in myeloablative conditioning in allo-HCT patients has impact on outcome.

39 keywords...

hide…