• Neurosurgery · Jan 2024

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Development of a Randomized Trial Comparing Intracranial Pressure Monitor-Based Management of Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury With Management Based on Imaging and Clinical Examination Without Intracranial Pressure Monitoring-Research Algorithms.

    • Randall Chesnut, Nancy Temkin, James Pridgeon, Stephen Sulzbacher, Silvia Lujan, Walter Videtta, Luis Moya-Barquín, Kelley Chaddock, Robert H Bonow, Gustavo Petroni, Nahuel Guadagnoli, Peter Hendrickson, Grimaldo Ramírez Cortez, CarreazoNilton YhuriNYHospital de Emergencias Pediátricas, Lima , Peru.Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima , Peru., Alcides Vargas Aymituma, Daniel Anchante, Patrick Caqui, Alberto Ramírez, Manuel Munaico Abanto, Manuel Ortiz Chicchon, José Cenzano Ramos, María Del Carmen Castro Darce, Roberto Sierra Morales, Pedro Brol Lopez, Willy Menendez, Sofía Posadas Gutierrez, Vicente Kevin, Andrea Mazariegos, Elie de Leon, Rodolfo Enrique Rodas Barrios, Sandra Rodríguez, Sandra Flores, Ovidio Alvarado, Luis José Guzman Flores, Melvin Moisa Martinez, and Pablo Gonzalez.
    • Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle , Washington , USA.
    • Neurosurgery. 2024 Jan 1; 94 (1): 727972-79.

    Background And ObjectivesThe efficacy of our current approach to incorporating intracranial pressure (ICP) data into pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) management is incompletely understood, lacking data from multicenter, prospective, randomized studies. The National Institutes of Health-supported Benchmark Evidence from Latin America-Treatment of Raised Intracranial Pressure-Pediatrics trial will compare outcomes from pediatric sTBI of a management protocol based on ICP monitoring vs 1 based on imaging and clinical examination without monitoring. Because no applicable comprehensive management algorithms for either cohort are available, it was necessary to develop them.MethodsA consensus conference involving the 21 intensivists and neurosurgeons from the 8 trial sites used Delphi-based methodology to formulate management algorithms for both study cohorts. We included recommendations from the latest Brain Trauma Foundation pediatric sTBI guidelines and the consensus-based adult algorithms (Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference/Consensus Revised Imaging and Clinical Examination) wherever relevant. We used a consensus threshold of 80%.ResultsWe developed comprehensive management algorithms for monitored and nonmonitored cohort children with sTBI. We defined suspected intracranial hypertension for the nonmonitored group, set minimum number and timing of computed tomography scans, specified minimal age-adjusted mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets, defined clinical neuroworsening, described minimal requisites for intensive care unit management, produced tiered management algorithms for both groups, and listed treatments not routinely used.ConclusionWe will study these protocols in the Benchmark Evidence from Latin America-Treatment of Raised Intracranial Pressure-Pediatrics trial in low- and middle-income countries. Second, we present them here for consideration as prototype pediatric sTBI management algorithms in the absence of published alternatives, acknowledging their limited evidentiary status. Therefore, herein, we describe our study design only, not recommended treatment protocols.Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…