• Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2015

    Comparative Study

    Regional Versus General Anesthesia in Surgical Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Does Avoiding General Anesthesia Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Complications?

    This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study, used 5 years of data to study 2,644 matched pairs-of-patients with a preoperative diagnosis of severe COPD.

    Important exclusions were patients already ventilated, already with pulmonary infections, along with cardiac, emergency & transplant surgery, and those receiving repeat surgery within 30 days.

    Receiving general anesthesia was associated with a 43% higher risk of respiratory infection (3.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.0384), 133% greater risk of prolonged ventilation (2.1% vs 0.9%, P = 0.0008) and 44% greater risk of unplanned post-op intubation (2.6% vs 1.8%, P = 0.0487), when compared with regional anesthesia.

    Nonetheless there was no significant mortality difference at 30 days (3.0% vs 2.7%, P = 0.6788).

    The mix of regional techniques was 341 epidural, 1713 spinal, and 590 peripheral blocks. Notably, sub-group analysis of epidural-patients showed no difference in pulmonary complications or composite morbidity between epidural and general anesthesia. (Though given relatively small number of epidural patients, this might reflect a lack of power).

    summary
    • Mark S Hausman, Elizabeth S Jewell, and Milo Engoren.
    • From the Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
    • Anesth. Analg. 2015 Jun 1; 120 (6): 1405-12.

    BackgroundSurgical patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of perioperative complications. In this study, we sought to quantify the benefit of avoiding general anesthesia in this patient population.MethodsData from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2010) were used for this review. Patients who met the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program definition for COPD and underwent surgery under general, spinal, epidural, or peripheral nerve block anesthesia were included in this study. For each primary current procedural terminology code with ≥ 1 general and ≥ 1 regional (spinal, epidural, or peripheral nerve block) anesthetic, regional patients were propensity score--matched to general anesthetic patients. Propensity scoring was calculated using all available demographic and comorbidity data. This match yielded 2644 patients who received regional anesthesia and 2644 matched general anesthetic patients. These groups were compared for morbidity and mortality.ResultsGroups were well matched on demographics, comorbidities, and type of surgery. Compared with matched patients who received regional anesthesia, patients who received general anesthesia had a higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia (3.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.0384, absolute difference with 95% confidence interval = 1.0% [0.09, 1.88]), prolonged ventilator dependence (2.1% vs 0.9%, P = 0.0008, difference = 1.2% [0.51, 1.84]), and unplanned postoperative intubation (2.6% vs 1.8%, P = 0.0487, difference = 0.8% [0.04, 1.62]). Composite morbidity was 15.4% in the general group versus 12.6% (P = 0.0038, difference = 2.8% [0.93, 4.67]). Composite morbidity not including pulmonary complications was 13.0% in the general group versus 11.1% (P = 0.0312, difference = 1.9% [0.21, 3.72]). Thirty-day mortality was similar (2.7% vs 3.0%, P = 0.6788, difference = 0.3% [-1.12, 0.67]). As a test for validity, we found a positive association between pulmonary end points because patients with 1 pulmonary complication were significantly more likely to have additional pulmonary complications.ConclusionsThe use of regional anesthesia in patients with COPD is associated with lower incidences of composite morbidity, pneumonia, prolonged ventilator dependence, and unplanned postoperative intubation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    comment
    1

    Though I don't generally trust propensity matched based studies, this one does rather support my pre-existing bias! One can get by with a GA but regional makes life easier for all concerned!

    Allan Palmer  Allan Palmer
    summary
    1

    This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study, used 5 years of data to study 2,644 matched pairs-of-patients with a preoperative diagnosis of severe COPD.

    Important exclusions were patients already ventilated, already with pulmonary infections, along with cardiac, emergency & transplant surgery, and those receiving repeat surgery within 30 days.

    Receiving general anesthesia was associated with a 43% higher risk of respiratory infection (3.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.0384), 133% greater risk of prolonged ventilation (2.1% vs 0.9%, P = 0.0008) and 44% greater risk of unplanned post-op intubation (2.6% vs 1.8%, P = 0.0487), when compared with regional anesthesia.

    Nonetheless there was no significant mortality difference at 30 days (3.0% vs 2.7%, P = 0.6788).

    The mix of regional techniques was 341 epidural, 1713 spinal, and 590 peripheral blocks. Notably, sub-group analysis of epidural-patients showed no difference in pulmonary complications or composite morbidity between epidural and general anesthesia. (Though given relatively small number of epidural patients, this might reflect a lack of power).

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
    comment
    1

    This study is important because it looked specifically at patients with COPD, whereas most studies to date (showing somewhat conflicting evidence on the benefit or not of regional anesthesia to perioperative mortality & morbidity) have looked at more general patient populations.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.