• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Apr 2020

    Observational Study

    Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the emergency department: A retrospective patient selection evaluation.

    • Michael Poppe, Christoph Schriefl, Anna Steinacher, Christian Clodi, Alexandra-Maria Warenits, Alexander Nürnberger, Pia Hubner, Michael Holzer, Johann Horvat, Dominik Wiedemann, and Christoph Weiser.
    • From the Department of Emergency Medicine (MP, CS, AS, CC, AW, HM, AN, PH, MH, CW) and Department of Cardiac Surgery Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (JH, DW).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Apr 1; 37 (4): 280-285.

    BackgroundThere is an increasing use of extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiac arrest. Recent studies highlighted the importance of an early and accurate patient selection for this invasive procedure.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to retrospectively validate a six-criteria-screening-checklist (witnessed collapse, bystander-cardiopulmonary resuscitation/first medical contact <5 min, shockable, age <70 years, end tidal carbon dioxide >14 mmHg and pupils not anisocoric/distorted/mydriatic) as an early screening tool in patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) at the emergency department.DesignRetrospective observational study.Setting/PatientsAll patients at least 18 years of age with nontraumatic cardiac arrest and without return of spontaneous circulation before eCPR treatment at our department between January 2013 and December 2018 were included in this retrospective observational study.InterventionNo specific intervention was set in this observational study.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcome was the rate of patients who fulfilled all criteria, secondary outcome was 30-day and 6-month survival in accordance with the criteria.ResultsOverall, data from a total of 92 patients were eligible for analyses. Out of these, 27 patients (29%) met all criteria. Patients, who fulfilled all criteria, showed significantly higher odds for 30-day survival [OR 6.0 (95% CI 1.78 to 20.19)] P = 0.004. Patients, who did not fulfil all criteria, showed significantly higher rates of early mortality after eCPR initiation [OR 4.57 (95% CI 1.69 to 12.37)] P = 0.003.ConclusionPatients fulfilling all inclusion criteria showed higher rates of survival after eCPR. Our results affirm that there is a possibility and even an obvious necessity for early patient selection based on standardised criteria before eCPR treatment. Large randomised trials are urgently needed to answer this question accurately.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.