• Lidija M McKnight, Stephanie D Atherton-Woolham, and Judith E Adams.
• From the KNH Centre for Biomedical Egyptology, University of Manchester, 3.503 Stopford Bldg, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom (L.M.M., S.D.A., J.E.A.); and Department of Radiology and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, the Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (J.E.A.).
• Radiographics. 2015 Nov 1; 35 (7): 2108-20.

AbstractHuman mummies have long been studied by using imaging as a primary investigative method. Mummified animal remains from ancient Egypt are less well researched, yet much can be learned about species diversity and the methods of preservation. Noninvasive imaging methods enable mummy bundles to remain intact, with no detrimental physical effects, thus ensuring protection of a valuable archaeological resource. This article is based on the research experience gathered during 13 years (2000-2012) with 152 animal mummies held in the collections of 17 museums in the United Kingdom. Conventional radiography, computed radiography, digital radiography, and computed tomography (CT) available in the clinical setting were used to assess the value of each imaging modality in the study of animal mummies and related material. Radiography proved to be an excellent research method that provided initial insight into the contents of the mummy bundle, and CT contributed additional useful detail in some cases. Paleoradiologic analyses enabled information on mummy bundle contents to be proved, including the nature of the skeletal remains and the methods of mummification. An optimum method involving radiography and CT is described.(©)RSNA, 2015.

24 keywords...

hide…