- Joan M Teno, Vicki A Freedman, Judith D Kasper, Pedro Gozalo, and Vincent Mor.
- 1 Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health , Providence, Rhode Island.
- J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug 1; 18 (8): 662-6.
BackgroundStriking changes occurred in health care in the United States between 2000 and 2013, including growth of hospice and hospital-based palliative care teams, and changes in Medicare payment policies.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare informants' reports and ratings of the quality of end-of-life care for decedents between 2000 and 2011-2013.MethodsThe study design comprised retrospective national surveys. Subjects were decedents age 65 years and older residing in the community from two time periods. Similar survey questions were asked at the two time periods. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted, using appropriate survey weights to examine response differences between time periods, after adjusting for the decedent's age, race, pattern of functional decline, and the presence of a cancer diagnosis, as well as the respondent's relationship to the decedent.ResultsA total of 1208 informants were interviewed; 622 in 2000 and 586 in 2011-2013. Respondents from deaths in 2011-2013 were more likely to state that their loved ones experienced an unmet need for pain management (25.2% versus 15.5% in 2000, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.3). More respondents reported that religion and spirituality were addressed in the later time period (72.4% not addressed compared with 58.3%, AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9). High rates of unmet need for palliation of dyspnea and anxiety/depression remained. The overall rating of quality did not improve but decreased (with 56.7% stating care was excellent in 2000 and 47.0% in the later survey, AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95).ConclusionsSubstantial unmet needs in end-of-life care remain. Continued efforts are needed to improve the quality of end-of-life care.
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
- Superscript can be denoted by
- Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens
- Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline.
- Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document
[^1]: This is a long footnote..