Pain
-
Comparative Study
Variability of "optimal" cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain: neglected problems when comparing groups.
Defining cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain intensity on the basis of differences in functional interference has an intuitive appeal. The statistical procedure to derive them proposed in 1995 by Serlin et al. has been widely used. Contrasting cut points between populations have been interpreted as meaningful differences between different chronic pain populations. ⋯ Optimal cut points are strongly influenced by random fluctuations within a sample. Differences in optimal cut points between study groups may be explained by chance variation; no other substantial explanation is required. Future studies that aim to interpret differences between groups need to include measures of variability for optimal cut points.
-
Despite well-documented racial disparities in prescribing opioid medications for pain, little is known about whether there are disparities in the monitoring and follow-up treatment of patients who are prescribed opioid medications. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine whether there are racial differences in the use of recommended opioid monitoring and follow-up treatment practices. Our sample included 1646 white and 253 black patients who filled opioid prescriptions for noncancer pain for ≥ 90 consecutive days at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System pharmacy in fiscal years 2007 and 2008. ⋯ Among those who had at least 1 urine drug test, black patients were subjected to more tests, especially if they were on higher doses of opioids. Compared with white patients, black patients were less likely to be referred to a pain specialist and more likely to be referred for substance abuse assessment. Addressing disparities in opioid monitoring and follow-up treatment practices may be a previously neglected route to reducing racial disparities in pain management.
-
The interaction between intensity of nociceptive stimuli and cognitive load in a concomitant task is still a challenging and complex topic. Here, we investigated the interaction between top-down factors (i.e., perceptual load), induced by a visual task, and bottom-up factors (i.e., intensity of nociceptive stimuli that implicitly modifies saliency of input). Using a new experimental paradigm, in which perceptual load is varied while laser heat stimuli of different intensities are processed; we show a significant interaction between intensity of nociceptive stimuli and perceptual load on both pain ratings and task performance. ⋯ However, under this condition, task performance was impaired, regardless of interindividual differences in motivation and pain catastrophizing. Thus, we showed that pain ratings can be reduced by increasing the load of attentional resources at the perceptual level of a non-pain-related task. Nevertheless, the disruptive effect of highly intensive nociceptive stimuli on the performance of the perceptual task was evident only under high load.