Pain
-
This study investigated whether one becomes more quickly aware of innocuous somatosensory signals at locations of the body where pain is anticipated. Undergraduate students (N=20) indicated which of 2 stimuli that were administered to each hand using a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), was presented first. Participants were instructed that the color of a cue (1 of 2 colors) signaled the possible occurrence of pain on 1 hand (threat trials). ⋯ Results showed that during threat trials tactile stimuli on the hand where pain was expected, were perceived earlier in time than stimuli on the "neutral" hand. These findings demonstrate that the anticipation of pain at a particular location of the body resulted in the prioritization in time of somatosensory sensations at that location, indicating biased attention towards the threatened body part. The value of this study for investigating hypervigilance for somatosensory signals in clinical populations such as patients with chronic lower back pain is discussed.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
The efficacy of a glial inhibitor, minocycline, for preventing persistent pain after lumbar discectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.
Minocycline strongly inhibits microglial activation, which contributes to central sensitization, a major mechanism underlying chronic pain development. We hypothesized that the perioperative administration of minocycline might decrease persistent pain after lumbar discectomy. We randomly assigned 100 patients undergoing scheduled lumbar discectomy to placebo and minocycline groups. ⋯ The incidence and intensity of neuropathic pain and functional scores did not differ between the minocycline and placebo groups. Exploratory analysis suggested that minocycline might be effective in a subgroup of patients with predominantly deep spontaneous pain at baseline. Perioperative minocycline administration for 8 days does not improve persistent pain after lumbar discectomy.
-
An accurate means of identifying patients at high risk for chronic disabling pain could lead to more cost-effective care, with more intensive interventions targeted to those likely to benefit most. The Chronic Pain Risk Score is a tool developed to predict risk for chronic pain. The aim of this study was to examine whether its predictive ability could be enhanced by: (1) improved measures of the constructs it assesses (Improved Chronic Pain Risk Model); and (2) adding other predictors (Expanded Chronic Pain Risk Model). ⋯ The Expanded Model improved significantly on the prediction of the Improved Model (NRI=0.56, P<0.001) and demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AUC=0.84, 95% CI=0.79-0.88). The Improved Model (AUC=0.79, 95% CI=0.75-0.84) and the Chronic Pain Risk Score (AUC=0.76, 95% CI=0.71-0.81) showed acceptable discriminative ability. A limited set of measures may be used to predict risk for future clinically significant pain in patients initiating primary care for back pain, but further evaluation of prognostic models is needed.
-
Research shows that placebo analgesia can be induced through social observational learning. Our aim was to replicate and extend this result by studying the effect of the sex of both the model and the subject on the magnitude of placebo analgesia induced by social observational learning. Four experimental (1 through 4) and 2 control (5 and 6) groups were observed: groups 1, 3, and 5 were female; groups 2, 4, and 6 were male. ⋯ Regardless of the sex of the subject, nocebo hyperalgesia was greater after the male model was observed. The results show that social observational learning is a mechanism that produces placebo effects. They also indicate that the sex of the model plays an important role in this process.
-
Pain is a frequently observed non-motor symptom of patients with Parkinson's disease. In some patients, Parkinson's-related pain responds to dopaminergic treatment. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate whether subthalamic deep brain stimulation has a similar beneficial effect on pain in Parkinson's disease, and whether this effect can be predicted by a pre-operative l-dopa challenge test assessing pain severity. ⋯ In the remaining 6 patients, pain was not improved by dopaminergic treatment nor by deep brain stimulation. Thus, we conclude that pain relief following subthalamic deep brain stimulation is superior to that following dopaminergic treatment, and that the response of pain symptoms to deep brain stimulation can be predicted by l-dopa challenge tests assessing pain severity. This diagnostic procedure could contribute to the decision on whether or not a Parkinson's patient with severe pain should undergo deep brain stimulation for potential pain relief.