Pain
-
A 2-part study in which memory for everyday pains was investigated is reported. The first part compared ratings of vivid, 'flashbulb' memories of pain and non-pain events. Memories of pain events were rated as having been more surprising, having induced more negative emotional change, and having provoked greater change in ongoing activity than their non-pain event counterparts. ⋯ It is concluded that memories of painful events are readily retrievable and that the memory for a pain event, the sensory and affective qualities of pain experience and somatosensory component of pain are separated in their encoding and/or retrieval. The possible mechanisms whereby pain memories are encoded and retrieved are discussed. The clinical implications of the data concerning how judgements of past pain are made and the possible role of memory in coping are also noted.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative local anaesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joint pain.
The utility of randomised, double-blind, controlled, comparative local anaesthetic blocks for the diagnosis of cervical, zygapophysial joint pain was studied in 47 patients with chronic neck pain following whiplash injury. Each patient was investigated with radiologically controlled blocks of the medial branches of the cervical, dorsal rami to anaesthetise the target cervical, zygapophysial joint. The blocks were performed using either lignocaine or bupivacaine, randomly allocated, and the patients' responses were assessed in a double-blind fashion. ⋯ The durations of pain relief obtained from the anaesthetics were consistent with the known characteristics of these drugs with bupivacaine lasting significantly longer than lignocaine (P = 0.0003). A subgroup of 13 patients were identified with unexpected, prolonged responses to one or both of the anaesthetics. Comparative, diagnostic blocks are a valid technique in the identification of painful zygapophysial joints, and constitute an implementable alternative to normal saline controls.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Is TENS purely a placebo effect? A controlled study on chronic low back pain.
Although high-frequency low-intensity transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) has been extensively used to relieve low back pain, experimental studies of its effectiveness have yielded contradictory findings mainly due to methodological problems in pain evaluation and placebo control. In the present study, separate visual analog scales (VAS) were used to measure the sensory-discriminative and motivational-affective components of low back pain. Forty-two subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: TENS, placebo-TENS, and no treatment (control). ⋯ This additive effect was not found for placebo-TENS. When evaluated at home, pain intensity was significantly reduced more by TENS than placebo-TENS 1 week after the end of treatment, but not 3 months and 6 months later. At home evaluation of pain unpleasantness in the TENS group was never different from the placebo-TENS group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The relationship between children's coping styles and psychological interventions for cold pressor pain.
This study examined the hypothesis that matching pain management interventions to children's preferred coping methods would increase pain tolerance and decrease self-reported pain during the cold pressor pain paradigm. Children aged 8-10 years were classified as 'attenders' (focusing on the stimulus) or 'distractors' (focusing away from the stimulus) based upon their spontaneous coping responses during a baseline exposure to the cold pressor. Children were then randomly assigned to 1 of 3 intervention conditions (sensory focusing, imagery, or no intervention) and completed the cold pressor procedure again 2 weeks later. ⋯ Although pain ratings tended to be lower for distractors using imagery, the significant interaction resulted from an increase in ratings for the distractors using sensory focusing (i.e., a 'mismatched' intervention). Results suggest that, for distractors, interventions that are consistent with natural coping methods are most effective in enhancing abilities to cope with pain, while a mismatched intervention reduces coping abilities. The findings also suggest further study regarding how to provide effective pain intervention with attenders, since neither intervention enhanced coping in this group.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Morphine injected around the stellate ganglion does not modulate the sympathetic nervous system nor does it provide pain relief.
Six patients with a presumptive diagnosis of upper limb reflex sympathetic dystrophy and 1 patient with anaesthesia dolorosa had pain and sympathetic activity assessed before and after injection of bupivacaine and morphine around the stellate ganglion. Sympathetic modulation was assessed by measuring the effect of each injection on the inspiratory gasping response (IGR), a measure of central arousal, the sympathetic skin response (SSR), a measure of peripheral sudomotor activity and the plethsymographic wave (PW), a measure of peripheral vasomotor activity. There were 5 women and 2 men with a mean age of 49 years (range: 41-66 years). ⋯ Bupivacaine did provide short-term pain relief in 4 out of 7 patients. Morphine did not produce any demonstrable effect on the sympathetic nervous system nor did it provide pain relief for any patient. Thus these data do not support injection of morphine around the stellate ganglion as it neither modulated sympathetic activity nor provided pain relief.