Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of epidural and patient-controlled intravenous morphine following joint replacement surgery.
The authors conducted a randomized, prospective study comparing epidural morphine with patient-controlled intravenous (iv) morphine in 30 patients recovering from total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Six, 18, and 24 hr postoperatively, patients used a 10 cm visual-analogue scale to indicate both their current degree of discomfort and the maximum discomfort they had experienced since the previous evaluation. Pain at the time of evaluation did not differ between patients receiving epidural (2.6 +/- 0.4 cm, mean +/- SEM) and patient-controlled iv morphine (3.4 +/- 0.3 cm). ⋯ Patients receiving epidural morphine were more likely to require treatment for pruritus (4 of 15) than patients who received patient-controlled iv morphine (none of 15, P less than 0.05). Minimum respiratory rates were lower in patients receiving epidural morphine (15.0 +/- 0.3) than in those receiving patient-controlled analgesia (16.5 +/- 0.4, P less than 0.05), but no patients required treatment for respiratory depression. The authors conclude that epidural morphine may provide more consistent analgesia following joint replacement surgery than patient-controlled morphine; however, there is a higher incidence of side-effects with the epidural technique.
-
To ascertain the anaesthetic complications requiring post-anaesthetic respiratory support in a large obstetrical hospital, the hospital records of obstetrical patients admitted to an adjacent general intensive care unit (ICU) were studied. Obstetrical patients who required mechanical ventilation following anaesthetic complications were identified and their hospital records reviewed. In a ten-year period there were 61,435 women delivered at the Mater Mothers Hospital (MMH) in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. ⋯ Complications included anaphylaxis, high block and failure of tracheal intubation. The incidence of a major complication of a GA causing admission to the ICU was 1 in 932 and for RA was 1 in 4177 when these were given for delivery (P less than 0.01). If a complication requiring ICU admission and mechanical ventilation is used as the criterion of safety it appears that RA is safer than a GA for delivery.
-
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of pretreatment with propranolol on the cardio-respiratory toxicity of bupivacaine, either plain or with epinephrine 1:200,000 (5 micrograms.ml-1) added. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats, anaesthetized with intraperitoneal pentobarbital, were divided into four groups. Groups I and III were pretreated with iv propranolol 150 micrograms.kg-1, and Groups II and IV received iv NS as a placebo. ⋯ Addition of epinephrine to the bupivacaine eliminated the protective effect of propranolol. All rats pretreated with propranolol (Group III) or NS (Group IV) died when given bupivacaine with epinephrine. In conclusion, acute propranolol pretreatment reduced the fatal cardiotoxicity due to iv bupivacaine in male Sprague Dawley rats, but the addition of epinephrine 5 micrograms.ml-1 to bupivacaine eliminated the protective effect of propranolol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Epidural fentanyl does not influence intravenous PCA requirements in the post-caesarean patient.
Forty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery were studied to determine the effect of epidural fentanyl on post-Caesarean delivery analgesic requirements as administered by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Following delivery of the infant, under epidural anaesthesia with lidocaine 2% with 1/200,000 epinephrine, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 ml of preservative-free normal saline via the epidural catheter or 100 micrograms of fentanyl with 8 ml preservative-free normal saline in a double-blinded fashion. ⋯ No differences were observed in any values between the groups. It is concluded that a single bolus of epidural fentanyl does not provide an advantage for postoperative pain relief in this patient population.