Journal of neurotrauma
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2012
A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in a multitude of deficits following injury. Some of the most pervasive in humans are the changes that affect frontally-mediated cognitive functioning, such as decision making. The assessment of decision-making behavior in rodents has been extensively tested in the field of the experimental analysis of behavior. ⋯ Upon reaching criterion, a reversal discrimination was evaluated in which the reinforcer was placed in unscented sand. Finally, a novel scent discrimination (basil versus coffee with basil reinforced), and a reversal (coffee) were evaluated. The results indicated that the Dig task is a simple experimental preparation that can be used to assess deficits in decision-making behavior following TBI.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Sep 2012
Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in expression of the water channel protein aquaporin-4 after ischemia in rat cortical astrocytes.
Brain edema after ischemic brain injury is a key determinant of morbidity and mortality. Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) plays an important role in water transport in the central nervous system and is highly expressed in brain astrocytes. However, the AQP4 regulatory mechanisms are poorly understood. ⋯ Treatment with SB203580, a selective p38 MAPK inhibitor, or SP600125, a selective c-Jun N-terminal kinase inhibitor, significantly attenuated the return of AQP4 to its normal level, and SB203580, but not SP600125, significantly decreased cell death. In an in vivo study, AQP4 expression was upregulated 1-3 days after reperfusion, which was consistent with the time course of p38 phosphorylation and activation, and decreased by the p38 inhibition after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). These results suggest that p38 MAPK may regulate AQP4 expression in cortical astrocytes after ischemic injury.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Sep 2012
A CD11d monoclonal antibody treatment reduces tissue injury and improves neurological outcome after fluid percussion brain injury in rats.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an international health concern often resulting in chronic neurological abnormalities, including cognitive deficits, emotional disturbances, and motor impairments. An anti-CD11d monoclonal antibody that blocks the CD11d/CD18 integrin and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 interaction following experimental spinal cord injury improves functional recovery, while reducing the intraspinal number of neutrophils and macrophages, oxidative activity, and tissue damage. Since the mechanisms of secondary injury in the brain and spinal cord are similar, we designed a study to evaluate fully the effects of anti-CD11d treatment after a moderate lateral fluid percussion TBI in the rat. ⋯ At 24 h, the anti-CD11d group performed significantly better than the 1B7 controls on several water maze measures of spatial cognition. At 4 weeks post-injury the anti-CD11d-treated rats had better sensorimotor function as assessed by the beam task, and reduced anxiety-like behaviors, as evidenced by elevated-plus maze testing, compared to 1B7 controls. These findings suggest that neuroinflammation is associated with behavioral deficits after TBI, and that anti-CD11d antibody treatment is a viable strategy to improve neurological outcomes after TBI.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Sep 2012
Comparative StudyOpinions on the preclinical evaluation of novel therapies for spinal cord injury: a comparison between researchers and spinal cord-injured individuals.
We previously conducted a survey to gather the opinions and perspectives of scientific and clinical researchers on what levels of preclinical evidence were needed to justify translating a promising neuroprotective or neuroregenerative therapy in spinal cord injury (SCI) into a human clinical trial (Kwon et al., 2010 ). Here we conducted an analogous survey of individuals living with SCI in which we gathered their expectations for the levels of preclinical evidence achieved by researchers in substantiating the neuroprotective and neuroregenerative therapies being offered to them in clinical trials. In total, 214 individuals with SCI completed the survey, and their responses were compared to the responses of the 235 scientists and clinicians who completed our previous survey. ⋯ SCI individuals also reported strong support for independent replication studies. In general, individuals with SCI had high expectations for the levels of preclinical evidence required to justify translating novel therapies into clinical trials. These expectations should be considered in the decisions to translate specific experimental therapies for SCI.