Journal of neurotrauma
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Jan 2025
ReviewBehavioral and Cognitive Consequences of Spreading Depolarizations: A Translational Scoping Review.
Spreading depolarizations (SDs) are self-propagating waves of mass depolarization that cause silencing of brain activity and have the potential to impact brain function and behavior. In the eight decades following their initial discovery in 1944, numerous publications have studied the cellular and molecular underpinning of SDs, but fewer have focused on the impact of SDs on behavior and cognition. ⋯ This study summarizes the known behavioral and cognitive consequences of SDs based on historical studies on awake animals, recent experimental paradigms, and modern clinical examples. This scoping review showcases our current understanding of the impact of SDs on cognition and behavior and highlights the need for continued research on the consequences of SDs.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Jan 2025
ReviewBehavioral and Cognitive Consequences of Spreading Depolarizations: A Translational Scoping Review.
Spreading depolarizations (SDs) are self-propagating waves of mass depolarization that cause silencing of brain activity and have the potential to impact brain function and behavior. In the eight decades following their initial discovery in 1944, numerous publications have studied the cellular and molecular underpinning of SDs, but fewer have focused on the impact of SDs on behavior and cognition. ⋯ This study summarizes the known behavioral and cognitive consequences of SDs based on historical studies on awake animals, recent experimental paradigms, and modern clinical examples. This scoping review showcases our current understanding of the impact of SDs on cognition and behavior and highlights the need for continued research on the consequences of SDs.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Dec 2024
ReviewRecognition of Traumatic Brain Injury as a Chronic Condition: A Commentary.
Many clinicians believe that residual impairments due to traumatic brain injury (TBI) are static once initial recovery has plateaued. That is, the effects of the injury are not expected to change significantly over the remainder of a person's life. This assumption has been called into question by several independent longitudinal studies showing that the long-term course of TBI may be better characterized as dynamic rather than static. ⋯ In the United States, specific benefits are available from health insurance plans, particularly Medicare and Medicaid, for persons experiencing chronic health conditions. Potentially the most important benefit would derive from health care practitioners becoming aware of the dynamic nature of chronic brain injury and thus being more attentive to how their patients could be better served to optimize improvement and minimize decline. Recognition of TBI as a chronic condition would not only focus more resources on problems associated with living with brain injury but would also enhance both the public's and professionals' awareness of how to optimize the health and well-being of persons living with the effects of TBI.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2024
ReviewA systematic review of reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials targeting early interventions in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention. To assess the methodology of clinical research, we performed a systematic review that evaluated the different outcomes used in RCTs targeting the early phase of moderate-to-severe adult TBI from 1983 to October 31, 2023. ⋯ Outcomes were mostly clinician-reported [177 (93.2%)], while patient-reported outcomes were rarely reported [11 (5.8%)]. In our review, there was significant heterogeneity in the choice of end-points in TBI clinical research. There is an urgent need for consensus and homogeneity to improve the quality of clinical research in this area.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2024
ReviewA systematic review of reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials targeting early interventions in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention. To assess the methodology of clinical research, we performed a systematic review that evaluated the different outcomes used in RCTs targeting the early phase of moderate-to-severe adult TBI from 1983 to October 31, 2023. ⋯ Outcomes were mostly clinician-reported [177 (93.2%)], while patient-reported outcomes were rarely reported [11 (5.8%)]. In our review, there was significant heterogeneity in the choice of end-points in TBI clinical research. There is an urgent need for consensus and homogeneity to improve the quality of clinical research in this area.