Annals of hematology
-
Annals of hematology · Apr 2018
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEfficacy and safety of ruxolitinib after and versus interferon use in the RESPONSE studies.
Ruxolitinib was well tolerated and superior to best available therapy (including interferon [IFN]) in controlling hematocrit without phlebotomy eligibility, normalizing blood counts, and improving polycythemia vera-related symptoms in the Study of Efficacy and Safety in Polycythemia Vera Subjects Who Are Resistant to or Intolerant of Hydroxyurea: JAK Inhibitor INC424 (INCB018424) Tablets Versus Best Available Care (RESPONSE) studies. This ad hoc analysis focuses on ruxolitinib in relation to IFN in the RESPONSE studies, with attention on the following: (1) safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib and best available therapy in patients who received IFN before study randomization, (2) safety and efficacy of IFN during randomized treatment in best available therapy arm, and (3) use of ruxolitinib after crossover from best available therapy in IFN-treated patients. IFN exposure before randomization had little effect on the efficacy or safety of ruxolitinib. ⋯ Rates and incidences of the most common adverse events decreased after crossover to ruxolitinib, except for infections (primarily grade 1 or 2). These data suggest that ruxolitinib is efficacious and well tolerated in patients who were previously treated with IFN. The RESPONSE (NCT01243944) and RESPONSE-2 (NCT02038036) studies were registered at clinicaltrials.gov .
-
Annals of hematology · Nov 2017
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyBortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone with or without continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide for primary refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomized phase III study.
This phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled study aimed to evaluate the benefit of adding continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide to bortezomib-dexamethasone in patients with primary relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive up to eight 3-week cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (20 mg; VD; n = 48) or bortezomib-dexamethasone plus oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg; VCD; n = 48). Median time to progression (primary endpoint) was slightly longer in the VD versus VCD group (12.6 vs 9.9 months, P = 0.192), and the hazard ratio for disease progression was in favor of VD (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.43-1.19, P = 0.196). ⋯ Further trials are needed to determine whether addition of cyclophosphamide to VD at a different dose/schedule confers clinical benefit. This study was terminated prematurely, with insufficient sample size to adequately compare the arms; the results should, therefore, be considered descriptive. This trial is registered: EudraCT Number 2008-003213-27; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00813150.
-
Annals of hematology · Feb 2017
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyHealth-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the phase III GADOLIN study with obinutuzumab plus bendamustine versus bendamustine alone.
We present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from GADOLIN, comparing bendamustine (B) alone or combined with obinutuzumab (G-B) in rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) questionnaire was administered on day 1 of cycles 1, 3, and 5 during treatment, at end of induction (EOI), bi-monthly for 2 years during maintenance/follow-up, and annually during extended follow-up until progression/death. Time to first ≥6-point worsening from baseline in the FACT-Lym trial outcome index (TOI) was estimated. ⋯ More G-B patients reported meaningful improvements on the FACT-Lym questionnaire subscales. Results were similar when follicular lymphoma patients were analyzed separately. The delayed time to worsening and greater proportion of patients reporting meaningful improvement in HRQoL in the G-B arm suggest that benefit in PFS is not at the expense of an increase in treatment-related toxicity that could lead to reduced HRQoL.
-
Annals of hematology · Dec 2015
Randomized Controlled TrialEfficacy and safety of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim in patients aged ≥ 65 years with immune thrombocytopenia.
Thrombopoietin receptor agonists increase platelet counts and reduce bleeding risk in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Studies have reported that these agents may represent a risk factor for thromboembolic events, especially in the elderly, who are at increased risk for such complications relative to younger patients. In this retrospective analysis, efficacy and safety data for romiplostim in patients with ITP aged ≥65 years versus those aged <65 years are described. ⋯ Duration-adjusted AE rates were similar for romiplostim versus placebo/SOC in older and younger patients. The risks for grade ≥ 3 bleeding (RR 1.92; 95% CI, 0.47-7.95) and thromboembolic events (RR 3.85; 95% CI, 0.53-27.96) were numerically but not significantly higher for romiplostim versus placebo/SOC in patients ≥ 65 years. Romiplostim is effective and, with the exception of nonsignificant trends showing increased risks of grade ≥ 3 bleeding and thromboembolic events (a trend observed in other studies), generally well tolerated in older patients with ITP.
-
Annals of hematology · Sep 2015
Letter Randomized Controlled TrialNegative PET: no guarantee of good prognosis in Hodgkin's lymphoma.