British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Lung management during cardiopulmonary bypass: is continuous positive airways pressure beneficial?
It is not clear if the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) improves lung function after cardiac surgery. We have measured alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference (PAO2-PaO2) in 61 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. ⋯ The time to extubation (P = 0.42) and early extubation (P = 0.87) were not affected by the use of CPAP. The results of this study do not support the use of CPAP during CPB as a mechanism of improving lung function after cardiac surgery.
-
Comparative Study
Tracheal intubation in a mannikin: comparison of the Belscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Tracheal intubation carries a risk of accidental oesophageal intubation; this is increased with inexperienced trainees, and in patients with a difficult airway. The recent introduction of an angulated laryngoscope, the Belscope, may permit a better view of the vocal cords and increase the accuracy of orotracheal intubation. To determine how easy it is to learn to use the Belscope compared with the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope, a group of medical students attempted to intubate a mannikin which had been modified to simulate a difficult intubation. Time to intubation was fast with both laryngoscopes, although faster with the Macintosh, but the Belscope produced an unexpected greater incidence of failed intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effect of cricoid pressure on ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway.
We have evaluated the effects of cricoid pressure on laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion after an elective rapid sequence induction in 100 patients allocated randomly to two groups. An attempt was made to insert the LMA after application of cricoid pressure in one group and with no pressure in the other. The anaesthetist was blinded to the application of cricoid pressure. Insertion was successful in 45 of 50 patients in the cricoid pressure group and in 49 of 50 patients in the non-cricoid group (P < 0.1) We discuss the implications of these findings for failed intubation in the nonfasted patient.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Radiological examination of the intrathecal position of microcatheters in continuous spinal anaesthesia.
There have been few studies of the intrathecal position of spinal catheters in continuous spinal anaesthesia. This prospective study was designed to examine radiologically the intrathecal position of 28-gauge spinal catheters. ⋯ The intrathecal position of the catheters did not depend on the level of the lumbar puncture (P = 0.6246), but was dependent on the position of the patient during insertion of the catheter (P = 0.0093), and on the depth of insertion (P = 0.0099). Our study suggests that patients should be in a sitting position during insertion of a subarachnoid microcatheter and that the depth of insertion should not exceed 4 cm.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in laparoscopic surgery: randomized, double-blind comparison with metoclopramide.
In a randomized, double-blind study, we have compared the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron with that of metoclopramide in 123 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. The patients received either i.v. ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg immediately before a standard anaesthetic. ⋯ In those patients with a previous history of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nausea was less severe in those receiving ondansetron compared with those receiving metoclopramide (P < 0.05). We conclude that preoperative prophylactic administration of i.v. ondansetron was superior to metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.