British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Ropivacaine 0.2% versus bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl: a double blind comparison for analgesia during labour.
We have performed a randomized, double-blind comparison of two epidural drug regimens for analgesia in labour. In the bupivacaine group (BUPIV), 101 healthy parturients received 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg ml(-1). In the ropivacaine group (ROPIV), 102 women received 0.2% ropivacaine. ⋯ The ropivacaine group was more likely to be pain free in the first stage (51% vs. 33.7%, P=0.01). There were no significant differences in patients' assessment of motor block or mode of delivery between the groups. Pain relief and satisfaction scores from midwives and patients were consistently better in the ropivacaine group, but did not reach statistical significance.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Dexamethasone for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia: comparison of droperidol and saline.
We have evaluated the prophylactic effect of i.v. dexamethasone 8 mg in preventing nausea and vomiting during epidural morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Droperidol 1.25 mg and saline served as the control. ⋯ Both dexamethasone and droperidol significantly decreased the total incidence of nausea and vomiting compared with saline, with incidences of 18, 21 and 51% for the three treatments respectively (P<0.01 and P<0.05 respectively). Parturients who received droperidol reported a more frequent incidence of restlessness (16%) than those who received dexamethasone (P<0.05).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Model-based automatic feedback control versus human control of end-tidal isoflurane concentration using low-flow anaesthesia.
We studied the clinical use of an automatic feedback control system to adjust the end-tidal anaesthetic concentration with a low-flow method. The end-tidal controller uses two input signals (the end-tidal and inspiratory concentrations) to control the isoflurane concentration in the fresh gas flow, using a model-based algorithm. We studied 22 ASA I-III patients during elective surgery lasting more than 2 h. ⋯ The automatic control system was more accurate and stable than the human controller for step increases and step decreases, with less overshoot/undershoot and greater stability [e.g. maximal overshoot 14.7 (SD 3.7)% and 18 (8.1)% respectively for +0.6 vol% step changes, and 19.8 (3.7)% and 30.7 (13.2)% respectively for +0.3 vol% step changes]. However, the automatic control system showed a faster response time than the manual method only with large increasing steps (e.g. 149 (32) s and 205 (57) s respectively for +0.6 vol% step changes) and was not different from manual control for decreasing steps. Automatic control of the end-tidal isoflurane concentration can be better than human control in a clinical setting, and this task could be done automatically.
-
The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine were evaluated during long-term continuous epidural analgesia (CEDA) for about 120 h. The total and free plasma concentrations of ropivacaine and the alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentration were measured in 12 patients after total knee arthroplasty. The infusion rate was adjusted according to patients' analgesic needs or side effects. ⋯ The highest individual free plasma concentration was 0.16 microg ml(-1). The individual peak total plasma concentration, 4.1 (1.2) microg ml(-1), was achieved after 67.7 (16.5) h, although the AAG concentration increased throughout the observation period. Our data support the safety and efficacy of long-term ropivacaine CEDA.