European journal of pain : EJP
-
Patients and clinicians sometimes take coping with chronic pain primarily as a process of gaining more control over pain. An alternate approach might include helping the pain sufferer to discriminate parts of their situation that can be effectively controlled from those that cannot. When faced with situations that do not yield to attempts at direct control patients may gain better results from leaving those situations as they are and investing their efforts elsewhere. ⋯ Further results showed that a number of the responses assessed by the BPCI were reliable predictors of patient functioning. In general less frequent struggling to control pain, fewer palliative and avoidant coping responses, and more explicit persistence with activity despite acknowledged pain were associated with less depression and anxiety and greater life functioning. These results demonstrate that, in some instances, attempts at avoidance and control of chronic pain may be less helpful compared with a willingness to experience pain and focus on functioning.
-
Clinical Trial
Predictive value of symptom level measurements for complex regional pain syndrome type I.
The validity with respect to presence or absence of CRPS I according to Veldman's criteria was assessed for measured pain, temperature, volume differences and limitations in range of motion. Evaluated were 155 assessments of 66 outpatients, initially diagnosed with CRPS I, but many of them not so on follow up visits. Pain was measured with VAS and McGill, temperature by infrared thermometry, volume differences by water displacement volumeters and limitations in range of motion by universal goniometers. ⋯ Using these cut off values, the highest value of sensitivity and of sensitivity and specificity combined, was found for a combination of VAS, McGill and ROM. The highest value of specificity was found for different combinations of 3, 4 and 5 instruments, all containing the VAS. We conclude that the measured pain, temperature, volume and range of motion can be used as diagnostic indicators for establishing presence or absence of CRPS I.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Efficacy of coeliac plexus and splanchnic nerve blockades in body and tail located pancreatic cancer pain.
Palliative treatment, pain therapy and quality of life (QOL) are very important in pancreatic cancer patients. We evaluated the pain relieving efficacy, side effects and effects on QOL of neurolytic coeliac plexus blockade (NCPB) and splanchnic nerves neurolytic blockade (SNB) in body and tail located pancreatic cancer. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. ⋯ The mean survival rate was found to be significantly lower in GC. Two patients had severe pain during injection in GC and 5 patients had intractable diarrhoea in GC. Comparing the ease, pain relieving efficacy, QOL-effects of the methods, splanchnic nerve blocks may be an alternative to coeliac plexus blockade in patients with advanced body and tail located pancreatic cancer.
-
Clinical Trial
Cognitive bias in back pain patients attending osteopathy: testing the enmeshment model in reference to future thinking.
Depressive symptoms are common in chronic pain. Previous research has found differences in information-processing biases in depressed pain patients and depressed people without pain. The schema enmeshment model of pain (SEMP) has been proposed to explain chronic pain patients' information-processing biases. Negative future thinking is common in depression but has not been explored in relation to chronic pain and information-processing models. ⋯ Results extend understanding of future thinking in chronic pain within the context of the SEMP.
-
Research suggests that chronic pain patients demonstrate cognitive biases towards pain-related information and that such biases predict patient functioning. This study examined the degree to which a successful cognitive-behavioural program was able to reduce the observed attentional bias towards sensory pain words. Forty-two patients with chronic pain conditions for more than three months were recruited prior to commencing a cognitive-behavioural pain management program. ⋯ Moreover, these biases appear to be changed by reducing the fear associated with movement. Theoretically, these results provide support for the fear of (re)injury model of pain. Clinically, this study supports the contention that fear of (re)injury and movement is an appropriate target of pain management and that reducing these fears causes patients to attend less to pain-related stimuli.