European journal of pain : EJP
-
The clinical characteristics of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)--spontaneous and stimulus-evoked pain, autonomic abnormalities, motor dysfunction, and trophic changes in the affected limb--are well known. However, its pathogenesis is unclear, and the diagnosis is often delayed, in part due to lack of objective laboratory tests. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor that has recently been shown to produce pain, allodynia, edema, and muscle weakness, as well as to exert a direct excitatory effect on nociceptive afferents. ⋯ The results showed that there were no significant differences in ET-1 plasma levels between the three groups. We conclude that the plasma level of ET-1 cannot be regarded as a 'marker' for CRPS. Yet, the possibility that ET-1 is involved in the pathophysiology of CRPS has not been excluded and deserves further investigation.
-
The PASS-20 was developed to assess pain-related anxiety among a variety of pain populations. This measure was constructed by extracting 20 items from its 40-item parent measure (PASS). Initial studies of the PASS-20 suggest that the psychometric properties have been preserved. ⋯ Results also showed that the total and subscale scores of the PASS-20 have good reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and validity (construct) correlating greater with other conceptually similar measures than distinct constructs. These results suggest that this measure has good utility for both clinical and research applications. Directions for future evaluation are also discussed.
-
Review
Does past pain influence current pain: biological and psychosocial models of sex differences.
Previous studies have generally indicated sizeable sex differences for both laboratory pain reactivity and clinical pain reports. Numerous biological and psychosocial models have been invoked to account for these findings, but the laboratory and clinical findings have generally been examined in isolation. ⋯ Since women often have high pain experience levels and lower pain tolerance, one might ask whether the two factors are related. We review several models, based upon concepts of neonatal differences in pain reactivity, hypervigilance following early pain experiences, and concepts of peripheral and central sensitization or plasticity which might help to bridge the gap between clinical and experimental findings.
-
Sex differences in analgesic responses to opioids have received increasing attention in recent years. This article examines the literature on sex differences in opioid analgesia, including the results of studies from the authors' own laboratories. In general, nonhuman animal studies suggest more robust opioid analgesic responses in males relative to females; however, the human studies completed to date seem to indicate greater opioid analgesia among females. ⋯ Multiple mechanisms may explain sex differences in opioid analgesia, including gonadal hormonal effects, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, genetic influences, balance of analgesic/antianalgesic processes, and psychological factors. However, the disparity of results obtained from different pain models--animals versus humans and clinical pain versus experimental pain in humans--suggests that the models themselves are mechanistically different. Additional investigation is warranted in order to further explicate the nature of sex differences in opioid analgesia and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Pain thresholds during and after treatment of severe depression with electroconvulsive therapy.
Pain and depression are often associated suggesting that both conditions share a common neurobiological mechanism, which modulate emotional function and processing of noxious information. Pain thresholds are hypothesized to be altered in depressed patients and normalized with the amelioration of depression. The purpose of this study was therefore to determine pain thresholds in patients during and after treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) of severe depression and in healthy controls. ⋯ While ECT significantly improved Hamilton depression score (from mean 23.9 (SD:5) to mean 12.5 (SD:5.7)) there was no significant change in pain thresholds during and after ECT in the patient group. However, depressed patients had significantly lower pain tolerance in the Cold Pressor Test on both examinations and on pressure pain tolerance on the second examination day than their corresponding control subjects. The differential effect of ECT on depression score and pain processing indicate that mood and noxious processing are not medicated directly by the same systems but that a complex relationship between pain and depression exists.