Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Sep 1998
Case ReportsRepeated episodes of transient radiating back and leg pain following spinal anesthesia with 1.5% mepivacaine and 2% lidocaine.
Transient radiating back and leg pain defined as pain or dysesthesias in the buttocks, thighs, or calves within 24 to 48 hours after recovery from spinal anesthesia has been described with the use of 2% and 5% lidocaine. These symptoms have also been associated with other local anesthetics such as bupivacaine and tetracaine, although with a much lower incidence. A recent case report and prospective study have described transient radiating back and leg pain occurring following spinal anesthesia with 4% mepivacaine. ⋯ Transient radiating back and leg pain may occur with lower concentrations (1.5%) of mepivacaine, as it does with lidocaine. The relationship between transient radiating back and leg pain and spinal stenosis is also discussed.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Sep 1998
Comparative toxicity of glucose and lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat.
Glucose is a common component of anesthetic solutions used for spinal anesthesia. However, its possible contribution to recent injuries occurring with spinal anesthesia has not been adequately addressed. Accordingly, the present studies compare the functional and morphologic effects of intrathecally administered glucose with those of lidocaine. ⋯ These results suggest that, at clinically relevant concentrations, glucose does not induce neurologic injury, providing indirect evidence that recent clinical injuries occurring after spinal anesthesia resulted from a neurotoxic effect of the local anesthetic. Additionally, the present studies suggest that deficits resulting from neurotoxicity of intrathecally administered anesthetic result from injury to the axon.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA clinical comparison between needle-through-needle and double-segment techniques for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.
The goal of the present investigation was to compare the double-segment and the needle-through-needle techniques for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSE) in a prospective, randomized, blinded study. ⋯ The needle-through-needle technique for CSE requires less time, has no greater failure rate, and results in greater patient satisfaction than the double-segment technique. The use of a spinal needle with an adjustable locking mechanism and protruding up to 15 mm beyond the Tuohy needle improved successful spinal block in the needle-through-needle technique compared with previous reports.