World Neurosurg
-
Phase 1 of the SUBSCI I/IIa (Systemic Umbilical Cord Blood Administration in Patients with Acute Severe Contusion Spinal Cord Injury) study focused on safety and primary efficacy of multiple systemic infusions of allogeneic unrelated human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells in patients with severe acute spinal cord contusion having severe neurologic deficit. The primary end point was safety. The secondary end point was the restoration of motor and sensory function in lower limbs within a 1-year period. ⋯ The data obtained suggest that systemic administration of allogeneic, non-human leukocyte antigen-matched human umbilical cord blood is safe and shows primary efficacy in adults with severe acute contusion SCI and ASIA level A/B deficit.
-
Neurosurgeons today are inundated with rapidly amassing neurosurgical research publications. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consequently surged in popularity because, when executed properly, they constitute a high level of evidence and may save busy neurosurgeons many hours of combing and reviewing the literature for relevant articles. Meta-analysis refers to the quantitative (and discretionary) component of systematic reviews. ⋯ Unfortunately, recent audits have found the conduct and reporting of meta-analyses in neurosurgery (but also other surgical disciplines) to be relatively lackluster in methodologic rigor and compliance to established guidelines. Some of these deficiencies can be easily remedied through better awareness and adherence to prescribed standards-which will be reviewed in this article-but others stem from inherent problems with the source data (e.g., poor reporting of original research) as well as unique constraints faced by surgery as a field (e.g., lack of equipoise for randomized trials, or existence of learning curves for novel surgical procedures, which can lead to temporal heterogeneity), which may require unconventional tools (e.g., cumulative meta-analysis) to address. Therefore, it is also our goal to take stock of the unique issues encountered by surgeons who do meta-analysis and to highlight various techniques-some of which less well-known-to address such challenges.
-
Studies investigating seasonality as a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery show mixed results. This study used national data to analyze seasonal effects on spine surgery SSIs. ⋯ PCF, PLF, and lumbar laminectomy performed during the warm season had significantly higher odds of SSI, especially postdischarge SSIs. Reoperation rates for wound management were significantly increased during the warm season for PLFs. Identifying seasonal causes merits further investigation and may influence surgeon scheduling and expectations.
-
Patient Reported Outcomes for Lumbar Fusion in Patients with Previously Treated Cervical Myelopathy.
Patients with a history of surgically treated cervical myelopathy and lumbar pathology requiring fusion present complex challenges, and literature describing patient-reported outcomes in this cohort beyond patients with tandem spinal stenosis is sparse. This has led to unclear guidelines in the literature. We present the first dataset comparing patient-reported outcomes for lumbar fusion in patients with isolated lumbar pathology versus patients with a history of surgically treated cervical myelopathy. ⋯ Patients with a history of previously treated cervical myelopathy have a similar rate of clinically relevant improvement after lumbar fusion compared with patients without such history. As such, these patients appear to benefit from lumbar fusion surgery to the same degree as patients without a history of surgically treated cervical myelopathy.
-
To compare patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) based on changes in perioperative cervical sagittal alignment. ⋯ In a uniform cohort of patients undergoing PCDF from C2 to T2, improvements in C2 SVA and C2-C7 lordosis were associated with improved early postoperative PROMs.