Cochrane Db Syst Rev
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewFixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins versus adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism.
Low molecular weight heparins have been shown to be effective and safe for prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is accumulating evidence that these new anticoagulants are also effective and safe for treatment of venous thromboembolism. ⋯ Low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as unfractionated heparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism, and significantly reduces the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at the end of follow-up. It can be adopted safely as the standard therapy for deep venous thrombosis, and studies comparing individual low molecular weight heparins are merited.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewInterventions for promoting adherence to tuberculosis management.
Up to half the people with tuberculosis do not complete their treatment. Strategies to improve adherence to treatment can be targeted at the person with the disease or at health workers. ⋯ We have found evidence of benefit for a number of specific interventions to improve adherence to anti-tuberculous therapy and completion of diagnostic protocols. These should be implemented by health care providers where appropriate to local circumstances. Future studies in low income countries are a priority and should measure adherence as well as clinical outcomes.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewInterventions for promoting adherence to tuberculosis management.
Up to half the people with tuberculosis do not complete their treatment. Strategies to improve adherence to treatment can be targeted at the person with the disease or at health workers. ⋯ We have found evidence of benefit for a number of specific interventions to improve adherence to anti-tuberculous therapy and completion of diagnostic protocols. These should be implemented by health care providers where appropriate to local circumstances. Future studies in low income countries are a priority and should measure adherence as well as clinical outcomes.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewMultidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults.
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs for neck and shoulder pain require substantial staff and financial resources. Despite questionable scientific evidence of their effectiveness, they are widely used. Neck and shoulder complaints are common among working age adults and they are often associated with physical work load and stress. Pain in the neck and shoulder area cause biopsychosocial difficulties for the patient especially if disability due to pain is prolonged. To help patients with biopsychosocial problems or to prevent their development, multidisciplinary biopsychosocial programs are applied on rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain patients. Nevertheless multidisciplinary treatment programmes are often laborious and rather long processes and require good collaboration between the patient, the rehabilitation team and the work place. ⋯ We conclude that there appears to be little scientific evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation compared with other rehabilitation facilities on neck and shoulder pain. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation is a commonly used intervention for chronic neck and shoulder complaints, therefore we see an urgent need for high quality trials in this field.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000
ReviewMultidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain among working age adults.
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs for neck and shoulder pain require substantial staff and financial resources. Despite questionable scientific evidence of their effectiveness, they are widely used. Neck and shoulder complaints are common among working age adults and they are often associated with physical work load and stress. Pain in the neck and shoulder area cause biopsychosocial difficulties for the patient especially if disability due to pain is prolonged. To help patients with biopsychosocial problems or to prevent their development, multidisciplinary biopsychosocial programs are applied on rehabilitation for neck and shoulder pain patients. Nevertheless multidisciplinary treatment programmes are often laborious and rather long processes and require good collaboration between the patient, the rehabilitation team and the work place. ⋯ We conclude that there appears to be little scientific evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation compared with other rehabilitation facilities on neck and shoulder pain. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation is a commonly used intervention for chronic neck and shoulder complaints, therefore we see an urgent need for high quality trials in this field.