The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Pain relief is associated with improvement in motor function in complex regional pain syndrome type 1: secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled study on the effects of ketamine.
There are indications of motor circuit changes in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Nevertheless, although several studies have analyzed motor behavior in CRPS, a relation with pain could not be detected. This might be explained by the use of cross-sectional designs in these studies, in which pain is considered as a trait- rather than a state-dependent variable. We therefore studied the time-dependent relation between pain and motor function in affected arms of 29 CRPS patients during their participation in a placebo-controlled ketamine study. Movement parameters (velocity, frequency, amplitude, and number of arrests) were assessed during a finger tapping task. Linear mixed model analysis of the effects of pain (numerical rating scale score), treatment (ketamine/placebo), and week (1, 3, 6, and 12 weeks after treatment) on the movement parameters revealed that pain intensity was significantly (inversely) related to motor function, irrespective of whether patients had received ketamine or placebo. Movement parameters changed 3-12% per point numerical rating scale change. Because patients were unaware of possible effects of ketamine on motor function, these findings suggest that motor function changes were mediated by, or occurred simultaneously with, changes in pain intensity. By improving motor function, pain relief may offer a window of opportunity for rehabilitation programs in CRPS. ⋯ This article provides evidence for a direct relation between pain and motor function in CRPS, which indicates that pain relief may be an important factor in the treatment of motor disturbances in this condition. These findings may help to advance our understanding of the pathways underlying motor disturbances in CRPS.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
An explanatory study evaluating the muscle relaxant effects of intramuscular magnesium sulphate for dystonia in complex regional pain syndrome.
The treatment of dystonia related to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) remains unsatisfactory, raising the need of alternative targets for intervention. In dystonia, pathologic muscle changes may occur, which contributes to stiffness. Because magnesium sulphate may act as a muscle relaxant through its actions on the neuromuscular junction and muscle, we performed an explanatory study of the muscle relaxant effect and safety of intramuscular magnesium sulphate (IMMG) in CRPS patients with dystonia. In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover study, 30 patients were assigned to 3-week treatments of IMMG and placebo. Treatments were separated by a 1-week washout period. The daily dose of IMMG was 1,000 mg in week 1, 1,500 mg in week 2, and 2,000 mg in week 3. The primary outcome measure was the difference in change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden scores after 3 weeks of treatment between both interventions. Secondary outcomes involved severity of dystonia, myoclonus, tremor, and pain, and functional activity. Data of 22 patients available for the explanatory analysis revealed no significant differences between IMMG and placebo treatment in any of the outcomes. In conclusion, we found no indication of efficacy of IMMG in a daily dose of 2,000 mg as a muscle relaxant in CRPS-related dystonia. ⋯ In this double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study there was no evidence found of a muscle relaxant effect of intramuscular magnesium sulphate in dystonia related to CRPS. Consequently, there is insufficient support for new studies evaluating the efficacy of other routes of MG administration in CRPS-related dystonia.
-
Factorial validity of the English-language version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale--child version.
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was developed in English to assess 3 components of catastrophizing (rumination, magnification, helplessness). It has been adapted for use and validated with Flemish-speaking children (Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children [PCS-C]) and French-speaking adolescents. The PCS-C has been back-translated to English and used extensively in research with English-speaking children; however, the factorial validity of the English PCS-C has not been empirically examined. This study assessed the factor structure of the English PCS-C among a community sample of 1,006 English-speaking children (aged 8-18 years). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted using a random subsample (n = 504) to assess the underlying factor structure. Items with poor factor loadings were removed. Confirmatory factor analysis, using the second subsample (n = 502), was used to cross-validate the factor structure revealed by exploratory factor analysis and compare it to the original 3-factor model and other model variants. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the original PCS-C and a revised 3-factor model comprising 11 of the original 13 PCS-C items, all loading on their original factors, provided adequate fit to the data. The revised model provided statistically better fit to the data compared to all other model variants, suggesting that the English PCS-C may be better understood using a revised 11-item oblique 3-factor model. ⋯ This is the first examination of the factorial validity of the widely used English version of the PCS-C in a large community sample of English-speaking children. A revised 11-item, 3-factor model provided statistically better fit to the data compared to the original model and other model variants.
-
The goal in the current study was to examine the analgesic effects of a pinch grip-force production task and a working memory task when pain-eliciting thermal stimulation was delivered simultaneously to the left or right hand during task performance. Control conditions for visual distraction and thermal stimulation were included, and force performance measures and working memory performance measures were collected and analyzed. Our experiments revealed 3 novel findings. First, we showed that accurate isometric force contractions elicit an analgesic effect when pain-eliciting thermal stimulation was delivered during task performance. Second, the magnitude of the analgesic effect was not different when the pain-eliciting stimulus was delivered to the left or right hand during the force task or the working memory task. Third, we found no correlation between analgesia scores during the force task and the working memory task. Our findings have clinical implications for rehabilitation settings because they suggest that acute force production by one limb influences pain perception that is simultaneously experienced in another limb. From a theoretical perspective, we interpret our findings on force and memory driven analgesia in the context of a centralized pain inhibitory response. ⋯ This article shows that force production and working memory have analgesic effects irrespective of which side of the body pain is experienced on. Analgesia scores were not correlated, however, suggesting that some individuals experience more pain relief from a force task as compared to a working memory task and vice versa.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Primary motor cortex function in complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dysfunction in the central nervous system is thought to underlie the movement disorders that commonly occur in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), with much of the literature focusing on reorganization of the primary motor cortex (M1). Presumed changes in the M1 representation of the CRPS-affected body part have contributed to new CRPS treatments, which are increasingly being integrated in the clinic. We systematically investigated the evidence for altered M1 function in CRPS. We adhered to rigorous systematic review procedure in our search strategy, risk-of-bias appraisal, and data extraction. Eighteen studies comprising 14 unique data sets were included. The included studies used several neuroimaging techniques, whose outcomes we grouped into M1 cortical excitability, spatial representation, reactivity, and glucose metabolism, and conducted meta-analyses where possible. Risk of bias across studies was high, mainly due to missing data and unblinded assessment of outcomes. No definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding M1 spatial representation, reactivity, or glucose metabolism in CRPS. There is limited evidence for bilateral M1 disinhibition in CRPS of the upper limb. ⋯ Despite widely held assumptions of primary motor cortex dysfunction in complex regional pain syndrome, there is only evidence to support bilateral disinhibition, and there is high risk of bias across the literature.