Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jan 2004
Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in The Cochrane Library.
The Cochrane Library of systematic reviews is published quarterly. Issue 2 for 2003 of the library was published in May 2003. That issue contains 2395 reviews of which 1669 are in full text. ⋯ Issue 3 contains 85 new reviews, five are relevant to practitioners in pain and palliative care. References are published in the same format as the citation for Cochrane reviews. The Cochrane trials database now stands at over 375,000 records with an additional 4100 one-page summaries of non-Cochrane reviews in the NHS database of reviews of effectiveness (DARE).
-
A notable and welcome increase in palliative care research has led to a multitude of ethical issues and concerns for researchers, clinicians, patients (subjects) and their family members (who also might be subjects), granting agencies, and professional journals. This edition of "Palliative Care Pearls" summarizes the recommendations from a work group that met at the National Institutes of Health in September, 2002. The primary purpose for that meeting was to explore the unique characteristics of this research population and the ethical concerns that might require tailoring of "standard" clinical research processes. ⋯ This 62 page long monograph was published as a supplement to the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (April, 2003). It includes six "plenary" papers, each that focuses on a distinct ethical domain of palliative care research and concludes with a set of recommendations and research questions. These might best be viewed as hypotheses that need to be tested or further explored.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jan 2004
ReviewTreatment of terminal restlessness: a review of the evidence.
Terminal restlessness is an important issue in the management of symptoms at the end of life with between 25% and 88% of dying patients exhibiting this condition. (1-5) The purpose of this review was to examine the empiric evidence about the pharmacological treatment for terminal restlessness. All available literature, in all languages, from 1966-2002 including randomized trials, concurrent observations, retrospective chart reviews, single case studies, clinical practice guidelines, expert consensus, single expert opinion articles, and editorials were reviewed as "best available evidence." Of the 72 articles reviewed, 14 met the criteria and were chosen for analysis. ⋯ There is insufficient evidence to suggest that a single medication or class of medications is appropriate for terminal restlessness. There is a clear need for additional trials of neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and combination protocols to determine which protocols are the most effective and have the least side effects.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jan 2004
Comparative StudyCancer pain intensity measurements in outpatients: preferences and comparison of pain scales among patients, caregivers, physicians and nurses in southern India.
Pain is frequently encountered in outpatient oncology practice and its management often is inadequate. Effective analgesia often could be provided for these patients through simple practices like pain intensity monitoring, documentation and treatment accordingly. A survey was carried out among cancer patients attending outpatient pain clinic to evaluate scale preferences, comparison of different scales as well as proxy reporting by caregiver, health professionals, for pain management. ⋯ VAS was the preferred pain assessment tool. In the absence of VAS scale, VDS also could be used. Proxy reports could be relied upon for management of pain.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jan 2004
Clinical TrialTopical lidocaine patch therapy for myofascial pain.
An open label study of topical lidocaine 5% patches was conducted for myofascial pain management based on the hypothesis that electrical dysfunction is a component of myofascial pain and therefore sodium channel blockade may be useful in managing myofascial pain. The efficacy of topical lidocaine patch therapy for myofascial pain impact of the therapy on associated quality of life were investigated in the one-month trial. Principal outcome measures were Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form for pain intensity and quality of life score changes. ⋯ Two patients reported complete pain relief and 3 reported a lot of relief. Mean improvements for average pain intensity (7, 14, and 28 days), general activity (7 and 28 days), mood and sleep (7, 14, and 28 days), walking (14 and 28 days), and ability to work, relationships, and enjoyment of life (28 days) were significant (P < 0.05). These results suggest lidocaine patches may be useful in the management of myofascial pain.