Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Dec 2021
Randomized Controlled TrialImpact of Standardized Educational Intervention on Improvement in Analgesic Knowledge and Its Compliance among Patients of Advanced Cancer Patients Attending Palliative Clinic: Prospective Randomized Study.
Patient education is a low-cost intervention that can help in improving the knowledge and compliance regarding analgesics. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the standardized educational intervention on knowledge regarding analgesic, its compliance, and barriers to compliance among advanced cancer patients attending palliative care clinic. In this randomized control trial, 100 advanced cancer patients with pain were randomly allocated to two groups. ⋯ There was also a statistically significant decrease in barriers to compliance in the experimental group as compared to the control group. A significant correlation between the knowledge and compliance score at 4 weeks in the experimental group was found with a Karl Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.628 (p = 0.001). The standardized educational intervention was found to be effective in improving the analgesic knowledge and analgesic compliance among cancer patients with pain at 2 and 4 weeks follow up as compared to the usual care.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Sep 2021
Randomized Controlled TrialEconomic Impact of Preoperative Meloxicam IV Administration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial Sub-Study.
We evaluated the economic impact associated with preoperative meloxicam IV 30 mg vs placebo administration among adult total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients enrolled in Phase IIIB NCT03434275 trial. Data on total hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) obtained from the trial were compared between meloxicam IV 30 mg and placebo groups. Patients in the meloxicam IV 30 mg vs placebo group (n = 93 vs 88) incurred an adjusted $2,266 (95% CI: -$1,035, $5,116; p = 0.1689) lower total hospital costs and an adjusted 8.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.0%, 18.1%; p = 0.1082) shorter LOS. While statistically non-significant, based on 95% CIs, the results from this sub-study may suggest a favorable impact associated with meloxicam IV 30 mg on hospital costs and LOS.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jun 2020
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialProphylactic Effects of Intravenous Dexamethasone and Lidocaine on Attenuating Hemodynamic-Respiratory and Pain Complications in Children Undergoing Cleft Palate Repair Surgery With General Anesthesia.
This study aimed to compare the prophylactic effects of intravenous (IV) dexamethasone and lidocaine on hemodynamic condition, respiratory complications, pain control, and vomit incidence following cleft palate repair surgery. This double-blind randomized controlled trial was carried out on 87 children assigned to three groups. Prior to anesthesia, subjects in groups D and L received 0.2 and 1 mg/kg IV dexamethasone and lidocaine, respectively. ⋯ Premedication with both IV dexamethasone and lidocaine provided similar stable hemodynamic and respiratory conditions during the surgical time. However, the use of dexamethasone developed more desirable effects on HR and SPO2 than administration of lidocaine during the recovery time. Both drugs significantly lessened postoperative pain compared to the placebo group at this time.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Jun 2018
Randomized Controlled TrialA Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Placebo in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.
Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer is one of the most commonly performed operations in men. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen when added to the perioperative analgesic regimen for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) on hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, a total of 86 patients undergoing RALP were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either 1 g IV acetaminophen (study group; n = 43) or IV placebo (n = 43) within 15 minutes following the induction of anesthesia and prior to surgical incision. ⋯ Hospital LOS was shorter in the IV acetaminophen group compared with placebo by 32% (P = .006). Median intraoperative opioid use in the IV acetaminophen group was 42 mg morphine equivalents compared with 50 mg in placebo (P = .64) and 8 mg in both groups postoperatively (P = .16). Overall, use of perioperative IV acetaminophen decreased hospital LOS without a significant difference in PACU LOS, pain scores, or opioid use.
-
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother · Dec 2016
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyComparison of Haloperidol Alone and in Combination with Midazolam for the Treatment of Acute Agitation in an Inpatient Palliative Care Service.
Agitation is a very distressing problem that must be controlled as quickly as possible, but using a safe method. The authors conducted a comparison of two protocols: a combination of haloperidol and midazolam and haloperidol alone. The combination drug protocol controlled 101 out of 121 (84%) episodes of agitation with only the first dose, whereas the haloperidol alone protocol controlled 47 out of 74 (64%) episodes. ⋯ The authors conclude that the combination of haloperidol and midazolam is effective and safe for the control of agitation in palliative care and it is more effective than haloperidol alone. Therefore, the combination should be adopted as the preferred protocol. It would be helpful if the usefulness of this protocol is confirmed by others.