Articles: analgesia.
-
Int J Clin Exp Hypn · Apr 2000
Meta AnalysisA meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: how effective is hypnosis?
Over the past two decades, hypnoanalgesia has been widely studied; however, no systematic attempts have been made to determine the average size of hypnoanalgesic effects or establish the generalizability of these effects from the laboratory to the clinic. This study examines the effectiveness of hypnosis in pain management, compares studies that evaluated hypnotic pain reduction in healthy volunteers vs. those using patient samples, compares hypnoanalgesic effects and participants' hypnotic suggestibility, and determines the effectiveness of hypnotic suggestion for pain relief relative to other nonhypnotic psychological interventions. ⋯ The results also indicated that hypnotic suggestion was equally effective in reducing both clinical and experimental pain. The overall results suggest broader application of hypnoanalgesic techniques with pain patients.
-
To describe the management of a looped and knotted epidural catheter after analgesia for labour and delivery. ⋯ A knot can be a rare cause of a trapped epidural catheter. A suggested approach to the trapped lumbar epidural catheter: 1) Gentle traction on the catheter with the patient in various positions and in various degrees of lumbar flexion. 2) Test for catheter patency by injecting sterile, preservative-free, normal saline through the catheter. 3) Radiological imaging to determine if a knot is present and to determine its location, using radiopaque contrast for patent catheters or a guidewire for occluded catheters. 4) The approach to definitive management is based on the position of the knot. This can range from excision under local anesthetic to consultation with a surgical specialty for more invasive retrieval.
-
J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. · Apr 2000
A survey of the current practice of obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia in Malaysia [correction of Malaysis].
A survey covering 30% of the deliveries in Malaysia was done to determine the practice of obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia for 1996. ⋯ Although the use of epidural analgesia for labour was low in Malaysia, the overall rate of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section (41.9%) is very much in keeping with the standards of safe practice recommended by the United Kingdom.
-
J Gynecol Obst Bio R · Apr 2000
Case Reports[Opioid spinal anesthesia at the end of labor for potentially difficult deliveries].
We report two cases of difficult delivery, one vaginal breech presentation and one vaginal twin delivery in agitated parturients who were not given epidura analgesia. Maternal agitation was caused by pain and led to the risk of difficult fetal extraction. ⋯ Spinal injection of 10 microg of sufentanil was followed by rapid analgesia, maternal sedation and atraumatic deliveries. The usefulness of this technique is discussed for analgesia during the second stage of labor when epidural analgesia has not been performed.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPostcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study.
The purpose of this study was to describe the dose-response relationship of epidural morphine for postcesarean analgesia for quality of analgesia and relation to the side effects of pruritus, nausea, and vomiting. Sixty term parturients undergoing nonurgent cesarean delivery were enrolled and randomized to receive a single dose of epidural morphine after delivery (0,1.25, 2.5, 3.75, or 5 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. PCA morphine use and the incidence and severity of side effects were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, Student's t-tests, and chi(2) analysis. Nonlinear regression was used to describe a dose-response curve. PCA use differed significantly among groups (P < 0.001); PCA use was significantly greater in Group 0 mg than Groups 2.5, 3.75, and 5 mg (P < 0.05). PCA use was also significantly greater in Group 1.25 mg than Groups 3.75 and 5 mg (P < 0.05). Pruritus scores were significantly higher in all groups given epidural morphine than the control group (0 mg) (P < 0.05), but did not differ among the treatment groups (1.25-5 mg), although pruritus scores were significantly higher in treatment groups than in the control (P < 0. 05). No relation was found between epidural morphine dose and incidence or severity of nausea and vomiting. We concluded that, for optimal analgesia, augmentation of epidural morphine with systemic analgesics or other epidural medications may be necessary. ⋯ Quality of analgesia increases as the dose of epidural morphine increases to at least 3.75 mg; increasing the dose further to 5 mg did not improve analgesia. Side effects were not dose related. For optimal analgesia, augmentation of epidural morphine with systemic analgesics or other epidural medications may be necessary.