British journal of anaesthesia
-
Researchers induced awake paralysis in 10 volunteers using separately both suxamethonium and rocuronium. Both the BIS A2000 (2003) and BIS Vista monitor (2013) were tested.
BIS decreased immediately after paralysis and did not fully recover until muscle recovery. BIS values decreased to as low as 44, despite the subject being awake.
In more than half of the 20 trials the BIS value decreased to below 60 at some point. In one case this lasted for almost 4 minutes, representing 76% of the total paralysis time for that subject.
summary -
Editorial Comment
Restrict relaxants, be aware, and know the limitations of your depth of anaesthesia monitor.
Interesting editorial accompanying Dr Peter Schuller's excellent study of BIS values in awake, paralysed volunteers.
The editors make a very interesting point critiquing the probabilistic, database-based approach to processed-EEG awareness monitors like BIS: (emphasis added)
"This database-driven approach may have limitations, in particular for the detection of intraoperative wakefulness: it is very unlikely that data from an awake and paralyzed subject are included in this database. Therefore, the resulting anaesthesia index has not been trained with a dataset that contains this clinical situation..."
-
Anaesthetic drugs act at sites within the brain that undergo profound changes during typical ageing. We postulated that anaesthesia-induced brain dynamics observed in the EEG change with age. ⋯ These profound age-related changes in the EEG are consistent with known neurobiological and neuroanatomical changes that occur during typical ageing. Commercial EEG-based depth-of-anaesthesia indices do not account for age and are therefore likely to be inaccurate in elderly patients. In contrast, monitoring the unprocessed EEG and its spectrogram can account for age and individual patient characteristics.