• J Clin Anesth · Nov 2017

    Review Comparative Study

    Outcomes of cancer surgery after inhalational and intravenous anesthesia: A systematic review.

    • Sinor Soltanizadeh, Thea H Degett, and Ismail Gögenur.
    • Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, DK-4600 Køge, Denmark. Electronic address: sinso@regionsjaelland.dk.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2017 Nov 1; 42: 19-25.

    AbstractPerioperative factors are probably essential for different oncological outcomes. This systematic review investigates the literature concerning overall mortality and postoperative complications after cancer surgery with inhalational (INHA) and intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). A search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, including studies with patients undergoing surgery for cancer and where TIVA was compared with INHA. Two investigators identified relevant papers in the databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Risks of bias assessment tools from the Cochrane Collaboration were used for evaluating quality of evidence. Eight studies with a total of 10,696 patients were included. Four studies reported data regarding overall mortality and four studies reported data regarding postoperative complications. Evidence was evaluated to be of moderate to serious risk of bias. Three retrospective studies presented a hazard ratio (HR) adjusting for several confounders. One study reported an increased overall mortality after INHA with a HR of 1.47 (95% CI 1.31-1.64, p≤0.001), while another study reported a tendency of decreased overall mortality after TIVA (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-1.00, p=0.051). A third study showed no difference in the overall mortality, but prolonged recurrence-free survival after TIVA with a HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.86, p=0.014). In one study, the rate of pulmonary complications was significantly higher after INHA compared with TIVA, while other postoperative complications were comparable. There are currently four propensity-adjusted retrospective studies indicating that TIVA might be the preferred anesthetic choice in cancer surgery. However, evidence is currently of low quality and randomized clinical trials are required for further investigation.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation  

      Add institutional full text...

    This article appears in the collection: Anesthesia technique and cancer recurrence.

    Notes

     
    Do you have a pearl, summary or comment to save or share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…