Neurocritical care
-
The effect of intracranial pressure (ICP) and the role of ICP monitoring are best studied in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, a variety of acute neurologic illnesses e.g., subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, meningitis/encephalitis, and select metabolic disorders, e.g., liver failure and malignant, brain tumors can affect ICP. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature about ICP monitoring in conditions other than TBI and to provide recommendations how the technique may be used in patient management. ⋯ Increased ICP can adversely affect outcome, particularly when it fails to respond to treatment. However, patients with elevated ICP can still have favorable outcomes. Although the influence of ICP-based care on outcome in non-TBI conditions appears less robust than in TBI, monitoring ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure can play a role in guiding therapy in select patients.
-
Review
Clinical Monitoring Scales in Acute Brain Injury: Assessment of Coma, Pain, Agitation, and Delirium.
Serial clinical examination represents the most fundamental and basic form of neurological monitoring, and is often the first and only form of such monitoring in patients. Even in patients subjected to physiological monitoring using a range of technologies, the clinical examination remains an essential tool to follow neurological progress. Key aspects of the clinical examination have now been systematized into scoring schemes, and address consciousness, pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD). ⋯ Conventional sedation scoring tools for critical care, such as the Richmond Area Sedation Scale (RASS) and Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) may provide reasonable tools in some neurocritical care patients. The use of sedative drugs and neuromuscular blockers may invalidate the use of some clinical examination tools in others. The use of sedation interruption to assess neurological status can result in physiological derangement in unstable patients (such as those with uncontrolled intracranial hypertension), and is not recommended.
-
Review
Advanced Monitoring of Systemic Hemodynamics in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Brain Injury.
Hemodynamic monitoring is widely used in critical care; however, the impact of such intervention in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) remains unclear. Using PubMed, a systematic review was performed (1966-August 2013), and 118 studies were included. Data were extracted using the PICO approach. ⋯ Choice of techniques for assessing preload, afterload, cardiac output, and global systemic perfusion should be guided by specific evidence and local expertise. Hemodynamic monitoring is important and has specific indications among ABI patients. Further data are necessary to understand its potential for therapeutic interventions and prognostication.
-
Comparative Study
A Comparative Study of Fractional Anisotropy Measures and ICH Score in Predicting Functional Outcomes After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Improved prognostication during the acute phase of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) could influence goals of care. We investigated the utility of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived data obtained during the acute phase of ICH in predicting outcome, compared with the ICH score. ⋯ The prognostic value of the ICH score surpassed that of DTI-derived data during the acute phase of ICH in this cohort of patients. Prospective and larger studies are needed to validate our findings and to assess the prognostic role of various DTI-derived measures at different times following ICH.
-
Intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is an emerging strategy aiming to hasten clot lysis, treat hydrocephalus, and reduce permanent shunt rates. Because of clinical heterogeneity of investigated patient effects of IVF on permanent shunt incidence and functional outcome are widely debated. The present study is the first to investigate solely endovascular-treated SAH patients. ⋯ In endovascular-treated SAH patients IVF neither reduced permanent shunt dependency nor influenced functional outcome. Despite established effects on intraventricular clot resolution IVF appears less powerful in SAH as compared to ICH. Given the reported positive effects of lumbar drainage (LD) in SAH, a prospective analysis of a combined treatment approach of IVF and subsequent lumbar drain sOeems warranted aiming to reduce permanent shunting and improve functional outcome.