Journal of women's health
-
Journal of women's health · Oct 2021
Breast Density Notification: A Systematic Review of the Impact on Primary Care Practitioners.
Background: In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented amount of advocacy and attention surrounding the issue of breast density (BD) in relation to mammography screening. It is largely unknown what impact notifying women of their BD has had on clinical practice for PCPs. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence from existing studies to understand the impact of BD notification on primary care practitioners' (PCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practice implications. ⋯ Findings consistently demonstrated PCPs' overall lack of knowledge about BD, low level of comfort in discussing and managing patients in relation to dense breasts, and limited consensus on the most appropriate approach for managing women with dense breasts, particularly in relation to supplemental screening. Conclusions: This review highlights important gaps in PCPs' understanding of BD and confidence in having discussions with women about the implications of dense breasts. It identifies the need for high-quality research and the development of evidence-based guidelines to better support PCPs.
-
Journal of women's health · Oct 2021
Disparities in Treatment Decisions for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.
Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) affects ∼1.4 million women in the United States each year. This study sought to identify differences in treatment decisions for managing noncancer-related AUB. Materials and Methods: IRB approval was obtained. ⋯ BMI and insurance status were not independently associated with receiving any treatment. Conclusion: Management of AUB differed significantly by age and race/ethnicity, but not BMI or insurance. Further investigation among larger diverse populations is warranted to test the generalizability of these findings.
-
Journal of women's health · Oct 2021
Observational StudyContraceptive Preference, Continuation Rates, and Unintended Pregnancies in Patients with Comorbidities: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Background: Patients with comorbidities are more susceptible to adverse pregnancy outcomes, morbidity, and mortality than healthy patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate how comorbidities influence contraceptive choice, continuation rates, and the unintended pregnancy rate in reproductive-age participants. Methods: We analyzed data from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. ⋯ Conclusions: Participants with serious comorbidities were more likely to choose LARC than healthy participants. Contraceptive counseling should always be individualized to the patient. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01986439.
-
Journal of women's health · Oct 2021
Building Obstetric Provider Capacity to Address Perinatal Depression Through Online Training.
Background: Perinatal depression is common, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Obstetric providers often do not receive training in perinatal depression, despite being the frontline providers for perinatal individuals. The objective of this study was to develop and pilot test an online training module to assess feasibility, efficacy, and acceptance in improving obstetric providers' knowledge, skills, and practices regarding perinatal depression. ⋯ Average Likert scores on overall training satisfaction were very high post-training completion (4.44 out of 5, with 5 being most positive). Conclusions: The module was feasible and effective at improving provider knowledge of perinatal depression, self-rated confidence, and self-efficacy. Improving the knowledge and skills of obstetric providers regarding depression is a critical part of any intervention aimed to close gaps in care and help ensure that patients receive optimal treatment.
-
Journal of women's health · Oct 2021
Representation by Gender of Recognition Award Recipients from Gastroenterology and Hepatology Professional Societies.
Background: Recognition awards from professional medical societies play an important role in physicians' career advancement. Our aim was to evaluate the gender representation of award recipients from gastroenterology and hepatology societies. Methods: We analyzed the lists of award recipients from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and determined the gender of these award recipients. ⋯ The proportion of women recipients varied among the societies, from 6.8% to 14.5%. Conclusions: The representation of women physician recipients of gastroenterology and hepatology society recognition awards has generally been low until most recently, when it has surpassed the proportion of women in the specialty. Because award recognition is important to career development, professional societies should have transparent processes that aim to identify and reduce various forms of bias, including gender-related bias, in all phases of award recognition.