Annals of family medicine
-
Annals of family medicine · Apr 2022
Observational StudyRepresentativeness of antihypertensive trials: analysis of serious adverse events.
Context: Representativeness of 'standard' antihypertensive drug trials is uncertain, with limited recruitment of older people. Some trials specifically recruit older participants to address this. Trials are obliged to report hospitalizations and deaths, regardless of cause, as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). ⋯ Conclusion: Trials report substantially fewer SAEs than expected from rates of hospitalisations and deaths among similar-aged people receiving equivalent treatments in the community. SAE rates may be a useful metric to assess trial representativeness. Clinicians should be cautious when applying trial recommendations to older people, even when trials focus on older people.
-
Annals of family medicine · Apr 2022
Patient survey superior to EMR extraction for eliciting positive symptoms at COVID-19 illness onset.
Context: COVID-19 has ravaged nations around the world, with New York City (NYC) and the NYC suburbs being particular epicenters of COVID-19 infection. Suffolk County, NY, has reported over 200,000 cases and 3,000 deaths to date. Most initial COVID-19 research concerned hospitalized patients. ⋯ Setting or Dataset: 107 patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases at the 3 primary care practices of Stony Brook University Hospital between March and December, 2020. Population Studied: adult, English speaking primary care patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 Intervention/Instrument: patient self report telephone survey, EMR data extraction survey Outcome Measures: symptom duration, symptom severity, persistence of symptoms at 3 month time point Significant Results: Patient self-report survey elicited nearly twice as many symptoms described at illness onset vs. those recorded in the EMR. Conclusions: Early in the setting of newly emerging infectious diseases, particularly those such as COVID-19 which involve multiple organ systems, patient self report of symptoms of illness rather than EMR extraction alone may be crucial both for identifying cases and in order to characterize pathophysiology of disease in real time.
-
Annals of family medicine · Apr 2022
Does de-implementation of low value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study.
Context: In the U. S., provision of LVC is prevalent (up to 20% of total health services), costly ($350 billion annually), and associated with patient harm. Concern about a negative impact on the patient-clinician relationship has been cited by primary care clinicians as a barrier to reducing LVC. ⋯ However, most emphasized that negative impacts could be mitigated if the clinician listened to them, spent time with them, and offered understandable advice. Conclusions: Findings emphasize prioritization of the patient-clinician relationship in LVC de-implementation interventions and suggest minimal impact of such interventions on the patient-clinician relationship. Evidence of service-specific differences was observed.
-
Annals of family medicine · Apr 2022
Patient perspectives on diabetes shared medical appointments before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Context: Shared Medical Appointments for diabetes (SMAs) are an evidence-based strategy improve health outcomes. However, which elements of SMAs are important remain unknown. Invested in Diabetes studied two implementation approaches (standardized [STD] vs. patient-driven [PTD]), using a curriculum focused on mental health and skill building in addition to diabetes self-management. ⋯ The peer mentor role was not always well received, likely due to variations in the peer mentor. Teaching style was very important to satisfaction, and all patients wanted guest speakers with varied expertise. A virtual format was acceptable. .
-
Annals of family medicine · Apr 2022
"The SUMMIT Team is All I Got": perspectives of medically and socially complex patients seen in intensive primary care.
Context: There is great interest in intensive primary care (IPC) interventions to address the needs of medically and socially complex patients, however it is unknown how these interventions impact patient experience. Objective: Describe the experience of patients on the Streamlined Unified Meaningfully Managed Interdisciplinary Team (SUMMIT), an IPC for patients with complex needs at a federally qualified health center serving patients with high rates of homelessness. Study Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 25 patients enrolled in the SUMMIT intervention. ⋯ Patients appreciated humanizing interactions with team members along with the additional support SUMMIT provided to overcome barriers to care. They spoke of the team as family members who valued them and they recognized how the program had helped them take a more active role in improving their own health. Our findings suggest that effectiveness of IPC interventions may lie, in part, on the use of team members who have the skills and commitment to deliver non-judgemental, culturally competent, longitudinal relationship-focused care.