The American journal of Chinese medicine
-
The efficacy and safety of Shengmai preparation combined with Western medicine (SMP-WM) to treat coronary heart disease (CHD) were reviewed. Twenty-five randomized controlled trials of SMP-WM treatment for CHD were retrieved from seven databases and other trial sources between their inception and April 10, 2021. The risk of bias domains was accessed by Cochrane Collaboration's tool, and the data were statistically analyzed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. ⋯ The combination also improved hemorheology by reducing whole blood viscosity (SMD = -1.59, 95% CI: -2.32 - -0.85, [Formula: see text] < 0.01), plasma viscosity (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI: -0.86 - -0.45, [Formula: see text] < 0.01), and fibrinogen (SMD = -4.21, 95% CI: -4.58 - -3.83, [Formula: see text] < 0.01). The SMP-WM combination favorably impacts cardiovascular events, angina symptoms, endothelial function, platelet aggregation, and blood viscosity, with comparable safety to that of routine Western medicine. Further investigation is required to enhance the strength of the evidence.
-
Meta Analysis
Chinese Medicine for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused enormous public health and socioeconomic burden globally. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine (CM) against COVID-19. Eleven databases were searched on April 30, 2021, and 52 studies were included. ⋯ Adjunctive effects of CM with lower certainty of evidence were found, including the improvements of symptoms, laboratory findings, and mortality. No or mild adverse events were observed in most of the studies. In conclusion, the current evidence indicates that CM formulae, particularly LHQW, QFPD, and FYYH, have adjunctive effects on the standard treatment of COVID-19.
-
Meta Analysis
Traditional Chinese Medicine for COVID-19: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
To compare the efficacy of different traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapies for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and provide a higher level of evidence in the form of network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review. We searched the studies from the following databases: CNKI, VIP, WanFang, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from the establishment of the respective database until December 2021. Relevant studies were screened according to the pre-established inclusion criteria. ⋯ In conclusion, the combination of TCM and CWM approaches may enhance the efficacy of CWM in COVID-19 patients. Based on the NMA result, JYH (120 mL) + CWM may be a more effective treatment and deserves further investigation. However, the differences in many comparisons between TCM interventions did not reach statistical significance; therefore, further high-quality studies are required to validate these findings.
-
Meta Analysis
Battlefield Acupuncture for Adult Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Pain is a major public health problem, causing heavy social and economic burdens to patients and society while consuming tremendous medical resources at the same time. Thus, there is a critical need to find low-cost, efficacious, and therapeutic approaches to help manage pain. While acupuncture is increasingly recognized as a promising pain-relieving method, less is known about a specific form of auricular acupuncture known as Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA). ⋯ Few adverse effects (AEs) were reported with BFA therapy, but they were mild and transitory. BFA is a safe, rapid, and easily learned acupuncture technique, mainly used in acute pain management, but no significant efficacy was found in adult individuals with pain, compared with the control groups. Given the poor methodological quality of the included studies, high-quality RCTs with rigorous evaluation methods are needed in the future.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine on Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Breast cancer is currently the most common cancer in women, and it accounts for 11.6% of all cancer diagnoses in 2018. Breast cancer patients frequently resort to alternative medicine in addition to conventional Western therapy. This study is to evaluate clinical effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) on breast cancer by conducting meta-analyses on 81 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 7215 subjects from eight databases. ⋯ Moreover, patients with complementary CHM therapy were associated with an mTTP of 2.79 months longer ([Formula: see text] < 0.00001) and an OS of 1.90 months longer ([Formula: see text] < 0.00001); they also had an increase in 3-year PFS ([Formula: see text]= 0.002), 2- ([Formula: see text]= 0.0002) and 5-year ([Formula: see text]= 0.006) OS rates. Therefore, complementary CHM therapy might demonstrate clinical benefits for breast cancer patients in terms of tumor response and survival. Clinical studies with further stratification of tumor stages and intervention types are highly warranted.