European neurology
-
Invasive electrical stimulation of the motor cortex has been reported to be of therapeutic value in pain control. We were interested whether noninvasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex might also act beneficially. ⋯ Some of the patients (6/6) had an analgesic effect, but for the whole group, the difference between active and sham stimulation did not reach a level of significance (active rTMS: mean VAS reduction -4.0 +/- 15.6%; sham rTMS: -2.3 +/- 8.8%). Further studies using different rTMS stimulation parameters (duration and frequency of rTMS) or stimulation sites (e.g. anterior cingulate gyrus) are strongly encouraged.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Zolmitriptan versus a combination of acetylsalicylic acid and metoclopramide in the acute oral treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomised, three-attack study.
This multicentre, randomised, double-blind study compared oral zolmitriptan 2.5 mg with a combination of oral acetylsalicylic acid 900 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg as acute anti-migraine therapy for 3 migraine attacks. In total, 666 patients took at least one dose of study medication (326 took zolmitriptan and 340 took acetylsalicylic acid plus metoclopramide). The percentage of patients with a 2-hour headache response after the first dose for all 3 attacks (the primary end point) was 33.4% with zolmitriptan and 32.9% with acetylsalicylic acid plus metoclopramide [odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.47; p = 0.7228]. ⋯ The incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events was very low with both zolmitriptan (0.9%) and the combination regimen (1.5%); the latter percentage included 1 patient who withdrew from the study due to phlebitis, which was classified as a serious adverse event. This study showed that zolmitriptan is effective and well tolerated for the acute treatment of moderate to severe migraine. Zolmitriptan was at least as effective as acetylsalicylic acid plus metoclopramide in achieving a 2-hour headache response, but significantly more effective than the combination therapy for other end points, including the 2-hour pain-free response.
-
To review the disposition and outcome of patients with back pain seen in a neurology clinic, and determine the value of the neurologist's input. ⋯ Of patients with back pain and related symptoms seen in a neurology clinic, about two thirds have non-neurologic conditions. These patients are usually treated symptomatically with medications, rest, and physical therapy, all of which could be managed by primary care physicians. In the neurologic group, the vast majority is treated in the same way as the non-neurologic group. When more specific measures are needed, such as surgery or pain management procedures (e.g., epidural blocks), then the patients could be evaluated directly by the proper specialist (pain management or spine surgery) rather than the neurologist. The neurologist's input does not significantly affect the diagnosis or the management, so that the neurologist appears to have no useful role in the management of such patients.
-
Biochemical markers of brain damage, e.g. ischemic stroke, should reflect the volume of irreversibly damaged brain parenchyma and the clinical outcome in a single patient in order to allow estimation of prognosis at an early stage. Tau protein, which derives predominantly from neurons and axons, is elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurodegenerative disease. This makes tau protein a potential marker of neuronal/axonal injury. ⋯ Tau protein was measurable within 6 h after symptom onset, peaked after 3-5 days and correlated with infarct volume and disability after 3 months. In conclusion, serum tau protein is a candidate marker of axonal injury. In stroke, its clinical use is limited, because it is detectable only in a proportion of patients.
-
Cerebral damage remains one of the hazards related to cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The use of biochemical markers of cerebral injury may be of practical value. ⋯ Significant correlations were found between values measured at several time points and impaired performance in a few tests at the 6-month follow-up. A stratification into two age subgroups led to the hypothesis that age might have a confounding or a modifying effect on the association between S-100 and NSE levels, and cognitive impairment.