Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
-
Sarcomas of the spine are a challenging problem due to their frequent and extensive involvement of multiple spinal segments and high recurrence rates. Gross-total resection to negative margins, with preservation of neurological function and palliation of pain, is the surgical goal and may be achieved using either intralesional resection or en bloc excision. The authors report outcomes of surgery for primary and metastatic sarcomas of the mobile spine in a large patient series. ⋯ Surgery for primary or metastatic sarcoma of the spine is associated with an improvement in neurological function and palliation of pain. The results of this study show a significant difference in patient survival for primary versus metastatic spine sarcomas. The results do not show a statistically significant benefit in survival or local recurrence rates for en bloc versus intralesional resections for either metastatic or primary sarcomas of the spine, but this may be due to the small number of patients undergoing en bloc resections.
-
The authors report the case of a 54-year-old woman who presented with an intraparenchymal granuloma in her lower thoracic spinal cord. On imaging studies there was an intramedullary enhancement at the left dorsal aspect of the cord immediately adjacent to the tip of an intrathecal arachnoid catheter used for intraspinal drug therapy. ⋯ A 5-mm caseating chalklike granuloma was carefully dissected away. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of an intrathecal catheter-tip granuloma growing inside the spinal cord parenchyma.
-
The vertebral artery (VA) often takes a protrusive course posterolaterally over the posterior arch of the atlas. In this study, the authors attempted to quantify this posterolateral protrusion of the VA. ⋯ When there was no dominant side, mean distances from the most protrusive part of the VA to the posterior arch of the atlas were 6.73 +/- 2.35 mm (right) and 6.8 +/- 2.15 mm (left). When the left side of the VA was dominant, the distance on the left side (8.46 +/- 2.00 mm) was significantly larger than that of the right side (6.64 +/- 2.0 mm). When compared by age group (< or = 30 years, 31-60 years, and > or = 61 years), there were no significant differences in the extent of the protrusion. When there was no dominant side, the mean distances from the most protrusive part of the VA to the midline were 30.73 +/- 2.51 mm (right side) and 30.79 +/- 2.47 mm (left side). When the left side of the VA was dominant, the distance on the left side (32.68 +/- 2.03 mm) was significantly larger than that on the right side (29.87 +/- 2.53 mm). The distance from the midline to the intersection of the VA and inner cortex of the posterior arch of the atlas was approximately 12 mm, irrespective of the side of VA dominance. The distance from the midline to the intersection of the VA and outer cortex of the posterior arch was approximately 20 mm on both sides. Anatomical variations and anomalies were found as follows: bony bridge formation over the groove for the VA on the posterior arch of C-1 (9.3%), an extracranial origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (8.2%), and a VA passing beneath the posterior arch of the atlas (1.8%). Conclusions There may be significant variation in the location and branches of the VA that may place the vessel at risk during surgical intervention. If concern is noted about the vulnerability of the VA or its branches during surgery, preoperative evaluation by CT angiography should be considered.
-
Perhaps the single greatest error that a surgeon hopes to avoid is operating at the wrong site. In this report, the authors describe the incidence and possible determinants of incorrect-site surgery (ICSS) among neurosurgeons. ⋯ Neurosurgical ICSSs do occur, but are rare events. Although there are significant limitations to the survey-based methodology, the data suggest that the prevention of such errors will require neurosurgeons to recognize risk factors and increase the use of intraoperative imaging.