Future oncology
-
Aim: To identify whether PD-L1 expression and EGFR status are associated with response to treatment benefit in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: The relevant studies were retrieved and systematic evaluation was conducted. Databases were searched until November 2018. ⋯ For patients with PD-L1 expression levels of ≥1%, overall response rates were significantly prolonged, but there was no difference in patients with PD-L1 expression levels of <1% (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.75; 95% CI: 0.87-3.52; p = 0.12). EGFR wild-type NSCLC patients could benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in PFS (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45-0.91; p = 0.01) and OS (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.62-0.73; p < 0.00001). Conclusion: This study indicates that PD-L1-positive or EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC patients might get potential benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Observational Study
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia/febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in solid tumors versus hematological malignancies: MONITOR-GCSF study.
This study aimed to report patterns of biosimilar filgrastim prophylaxis and outcomes of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN)/febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with hematological malignancies or solid tumors. ⋯ Adequate GCSF support in hematology and solid tumor patients is important to prevent CIN/FN and related hospitalizations and chemotherapy disturbances.
-
Comparative Study
Lenvatinib plus everolimus or pembrolizumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: study design and rationale.
Lenvatinib plus everolimus is approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after one prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a Phase I/II trial of RCC. ⋯ We describe the rationale and design of the CLEAR study, a three-arm Phase III trial comparing lenvatinib plus everolimus and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib monotherapy for first-line treatment of RCC. Eligible patients must have advanced clear cell RCC and must not have received any prior systemic anticancer therapy. The primary end point is progression-free survival; secondary end points include objective response rate, overall survival, safety, health-related quality of life and pharmacokinetics. Biomarker evaluations are included as exploratory end points.
-
We aimed to investigate the effect of current treatment based on stage and histology type, which were important factors for treating esophageal cancer. ⋯ Neoadjuvant radiotherapy might be optimal for cT2-T4aM0 ESCC. Radiation was recommended for T4b ESCC while chemotherapy was recommended for T4b EAC.