The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2).
We reviewed data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2 to determine the differences in characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have undergone previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and those who have not, and between post-CABG patients who were treated with alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator [rt-PA]) and those who were treated with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Demographic, therapeutic, and outcome data from patients with AMI were collected at > 1,000 hospitals in the United States in collaboration with National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2. ⋯ Among the post-CABG patients who received rT-PA or underwent PTCA, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rate or the combined end point of death and nonfatal stroke. Thus, (1) prior CABG is an independent predictor of mortality, and (2) for post-CABG patients with AMI who are not in shock and who are lytic-eligible, reperfusion therapy with rt-PA and PTCA result in similar outcomes with regard to in-hospital mortality and the combined end point of death and nonfatal stroke.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of oral loading dose of propafenone and amiodarone for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation. PARSIFAL Study Group.
In patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), restoration of sinus rhythm is considered to be the first-line therapeutic option. Although this conversion might be obtained by direct-current shock or intravenous antiarrhythmic drugs, administration of an oral loading dose of class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs is more simple and convenient. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study compares the time to conversion to sinus rhythm obtained with an oral loading dose of propafenone or amiodarone. ⋯ After 24 hours (56% in the propofenone and 47% in the amiodarone group) and 48 hours, the same proportion of patients in the 2 groups recovered sinus rhythm (no serious adverse events were noticed). Thus, oral loading dose of propafenone or amiodarone was safe with a similar conversion rate of recent-onset AF. Propafenone had a faster action.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of propafenone versus procainamide for the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy in terminating postoperative atrial fibrillation of the class Ic drug propafenone versus class Ia drug procainamide was conducted. Intravenous propafenone was superior to procainamide in achieving rapid cardioversion and a better rate control with a lower incidence of symptomatic hypotension.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Prior aspirin use predicts worse outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators. Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy.
Aspirin is beneficial in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular events, but patients who have events while taking aspirin may have worse outcomes than those not on aspirin. We investigated the association between prior aspirin use and clinical outcomes in 9,461 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in the Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial, before and after adjustment for baseline factors. We also examined whether eptifibatide has a differential treatment effect in prior aspirin users. ⋯ In a multivariable model, eptifibatide did not have a different treatment effect in prior aspirin users compared with nonusers (p = 0.534). Prior aspirin users had fewer enrollment MIs but worse long-term outcomes than nonusers. We found no evidence for a different treatment effect of eptifibatide in prior aspirin users.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Sildenafil citrate and blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of drug interaction studies with an organic nitrate and a calcium antagonist.
Sildenafil, a selective inhibitor of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), is a well-tolerated and highly effective treatment for erectile dysfunction. The mechanism of action of sildenafil depends on activation of the nitric oxide (NO)-cGMP pathway during sexual stimulation, which results in corpus cavernosal smooth muscle relaxation and penile erection. Endogenously derived NO is also involved in blood pressure regulation through its effect on basal vascular tone, which is mediated by cGMP levels. ⋯ Adverse events considered to be related to sildenafil treatment included headache, nausea, and dyspepsia. In patients with hypertension who were taking amlodipine therapy, sildenafil produced additive, but not synergistic, reductions in blood pressure. The difference in the mean maximum change from baseline in blood pressure between sildenafil plus amlodipine and placebo plus amlodipine was comparable to the decrease in blood pressure reported for healthy men taking sildenafil alone. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)