The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Use of esmolol in hypertension after cardiac surgery.
Systolic hypertension, which is common soon after cardiac surgery, increases cardiac work and may threaten fresh vascular anastomoses. Because postoperative hypertension is often associated with elevated catecholamines and preoperative use of beta-blocking agents, esmolol, an ultrashort-acting beta-blocking agent, was compared with nitroprusside in a crossover study in this setting. Twelve patients, 18 to 28 hours after cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass graft in 9, aortic valve replacement in 2 and valved aortic conduit with reimplantation of coronary arteries in 1 patient) received controlled infusions of esmolol (mean dosage 142 +/- 100 micrograms/kg/min, range 50 to 300 micrograms/kg/min) and nitroprusside (mean dose 1.6 +/- 1.3 micrograms/kg/min, range 0.5 to 2.75 micrograms/kg/min). ⋯ Systemic vascular resistance, unchanged by esmolol, was decreased significantly by nitroprusside. Oxygen saturation and Pao2, unchanged with esmolol, were both significantly reduced with nitroprusside. Thus, for hypertension early after cardiac surgery, esmolol is safe, effective and rapid and, compared with nitroprusside, results in less unwanted decrease in diastolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation, but there is more decrease in heart rate and cardiac index.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparative efficacy and safety of oral tocainide and quinidine for benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias.
The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral tocainide hydrochloride and quinidine sulfate were compared in a double-blind, 3-center, parallel trial involving 133 patients with benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Baseline demographic, etiologic, functional and ventricular arrhythmia data were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Two weeks of an initial placebo period were followed by 8 weeks of active drug treatment, concluding with 4 weeks of washout. ⋯ Quinidine caused a prolongation in the QT interval (0.03 second); tocainide caused a slight reduction (0.01 second). No important changes in vital signs or laboratory measurements were observed in left ventricular ejection fraction when measured. Thus, tocainide, the new oral analog of lidocaine, appears to be as safe as quinidine but is slightly less effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: effects on chest pain.
The effect of metoprolol on chest pain was compared with that of placebo in all randomized patients. The pain score before and 15 minutes after the injection of trial medication was registered and a reduction in chest pain was observed in the metoprolol group. Increasing chest pain after blind injection was observed in only 16 and 9 patients from the placebo and metoprolol groups, respectively. ⋯ Either metoprolol does not induce coronary vasospasm or spasm does not play a role in these patients with definite and suspected acute myocardial infarction as well as unstable angina pectoris. Metoprolol reduced the need for analgesics during the first 4 days and shortened the duration of pain. The effects were similar in patients with early and late treatment, but may depend on initial heart rate, blood pressure and site of infarction.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Göteborg Metoprolol Trial: design, patient characteristics and conduct.
The Göteborg Metoprolol Trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified trial aimed at evaluating the effect of the beta 1-selective blocker, metoprolol, in suspected acute myocardial infarction and during 2 years of follow-up. The primary end-point was 3-month mortality (blind treatment period). Secondary end-points were 2-year mortality, indirect signs of infarct size, chest pain, arrhythmias and tolerability. ⋯ Treatment started as soon as possible after arrival in hospital with intravenous administration followed by oral treatment for 3 months. All patients were randomized 48 hours or less after estimated onset of infarction and 69% were randomized at 12 hours or less. The blind treatment had to be withdrawn in 19% of all randomized patients before the end of the 3-month follow-up.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Hemodynamic comparison of primary venous or arteriolar dilatation and the subsequent effect of furosemide in left ventricular failure after acute myocardial infarction.
The hemodynamic effect of venous dilatation (intravenous isosorbide dinitrate [ISDN]) and arteriolar dilatation (intravenous hydralazine), both as firstline treatment and then combined with intravenous furosemide, were evaluated in a randomized, between-group comparison in 20 men with severe acute left-sided cardiac failure after myocardial infarction (MI). Both ISDN (50 to 200 micrograms/kg/hour) (Group 1) and hydralazine (0.15 mg/kg) (Group 2) reduced systemic arterial pressure (p less than 0.05) and vascular resistance (p less than 0.05). Pulmonary artery occluded pressure was reduced (p less than 0.01) only by ISDN, whereas heart rate (p less than 0.01), cardiac output (p less than 0.01) and stroke volume (p less than 0.05) were increased only after hydralazine. ⋯ In conclusion, ISDN-induced venous dilatation is preferable to primary arteriolar dilatation by hydralazine as first-line treatment in acute left-sided cardiac failure. However, hydralazine and furosemide in combination were equally effective in reducing pulmonary artery occluded pressure and increasing cardiac output. The influences of each regimen on prognosis await further investigation.