Endoscopy
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
The majority of gastrointestinal endoscopists in the United Kingdom routinely use intravenous sedation prior to diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial to help determine whether the use of sedation influences the duration, safety, and tolerance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. ⋯ In patients who are willing to contemplate upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation, the avoidance of sedation may lead to faster and easier endoscopies, without any increased risk of procedural difficulties or adverse events.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Immediate recovery of psychomotor function after patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation for colonoscopy.
Previous studies have shown that patients inhaling-self-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen as a sedative/analgesic medication for colonoscopy were ready to leave the endoscopy unit on average sooner than those given conventional intravenous premedication. The aim of this study was to define the time course of recovery after nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation or intravenous opiate/benzodiazepine premedication for colonoscopy. ⋯ The rapid recovery observed with nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation for colonoscopy suggests that it is safe for patients to travel unescorted after the procedure. Driving may also be safe soon after nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation, but this requires further clarification.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The role of pethidine in sedation for colonoscopy.
As sedation with a combination of benzodiazepines and opioids has been associated with an increased risk of serious cardiorespiratory events, it is rarely used in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The combination is, however, still commonly used in sedation for colonscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study aimed to determine the benefits and disadvantages of adding pethidine to diazepam (Diazemuls) in the sedation for colonoscopic examinations. ⋯ Although the patients had no preference for either regime, there may be an advantage in using the combination of Diazemuls and pethidine, as there was a trend for this combination to be preferred by the colonoscopists. The combination of a benzodiazepine with an opiate should be used with caution, however, as there was a greater requirement for oxygen in the group sedated by Diazemuls and pethidine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam.
A benzodiazepine is generally used when sedation is required for endoscopy, whilst the newer agent propofol appears to have a more suitable pharmacokinetic profile. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of sedation provided by midazolam and propofol under controlled conditions. ⋯ Compared to midazolam, propofol facilitated gastroscopy to a greater extent. However, due to its narrower therapeutic range, propofol is the more demanding agent to administer, thus making it less universally applicable than midazolam.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effects of flumazenil after midazolam premedication in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy.
The degree of sedation and amnesia, subjective assessment of awakening and side effects after intravenous injection of 3-4 mg midazolam and 1 mg flumazenil or placebo were studied directly after colonoscopy, and on the first and the eight day. A total of 91 patients were studied; 45 patients were given flumazenil and 46 patients a placebo. Five minutes after injection of the test drugs all 45 patients given flumazenil but only 38 patients given the placebo were alert (p = 0.006). ⋯ However, resedation due to the effects of midazolam may occur. Flumazenil thus permits administration of a higher dose of midazolam without prolongation of the surveillance time. Improved exploitation of time, space and nursing resources is thus possible without jeopardizing patient safety, although caution is necessary since patients may not be fit to resume all normal activities.