Injury
-
Childhood injury is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide with the most socio-economically deprived children at greatest risk. Current routine NHS hospital data collection in England is inadequate to inform or evaluate prevention strategies. A pilot study of enhanced data collection was conducted to assess the feasibility of collecting accident and emergency data for national injury surveillance. ⋯ There is evidence of area level income inequalities in injury incidence among children attending the Royal London Hospital. The audit failed to capture a high proportion of cases, likely due to the paper-based format used. This study highlights the importance of routinely collecting enhanced injury data in computerized hospital admission systems to provide the necessary evidence base for effective injury prevention. The findings have contributed to plans for implementation.
-
Global mortality of polytraumatised patients presenting pelvic ring fractures remains high (330%), despite improvements in treatment algorithms in Level I Trauma Centers. Many classifications have been developed in order to identify and analyse these pelvic ring lesions. However, it remains difficult to predict intra-pelvic haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to identify pelvic ring anatomical lesions associated with significant blood loss, susceptible to lead to life-threatening haemorrhage. ⋯ It appears that in our series the primary identification and classification of osteo-ligamentous lesions (according to Letournel and Denis' classifications) allows to anticipate the importance of bleeding and to adapt the management of patients accordingly, in order to quickly organise angiography with embolisation.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of long-term outcomes following traumatic injury: What is the unique experience for those with brain injury compared with orthopaedic injury?
Whilst it has been well-demonstrated that traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in long-term cognitive, behavioural and emotional difficulties, less is understood about how these outcomes differ from those following traumatic orthopaedic injury (TOI). The aim of this study was to compare self-reported outcomes at 5-10 years post-injury for those with TBI, TOI, and uninjured controls. It was hypothesised that participants with TBI would have greater cognitive difficulties; participants with TOI and TBI would have similar functional and physical outcomes, both being poorer than controls; and participants with TBI would have poorer psychosocial outcomes than those with TOI. ⋯ Both TOI and TBI cause long-term disability, interference from pain, and psychological distress. However, cognitive impairments, unemployment, lack of long-term relationships, anxiety and PTSD are more substantial long-term problems following TBI. Findings from this study have implications for managing risks associated with these injury groups and tailoring rehabilitation to improve long-term outcomes.
-
By analysing risk-adjusted mortality ratios, weaknesses in the process of care might be identified. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the main cause of death in trauma, and thus it is crucial that trauma prediction models are valid for TBI patients. Accordingly, we assessed the validity of the RISC score in TBI patients by internal and external validation analyses. ⋯ The RISC score was found to be of limited predictive value in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. A new general trauma scoring system that includes TBI specific prognostic factors is warranted.