Injury
-
Comparative Study
Managing Vancouver B1 fractures by cerclage system compared to locking plate fixation - a biomechanical study.
With increasing life expectancy and number of total hip arthroplasties (THA), the need for revision surgery is increasing too. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal fracture treatment for a clinically characteristic Vancouver B1 fracture. We hypothesized that locking plate fixation has biomechanical advantages over fixation with a simple cerclage system. ⋯ In conclusion, the present biomechanical study indicates that periprosthetic Vancouver B1 fractures can be sufficiently fixed by simple cerclage systems. Revision with a long replacement stem provides a superior mechanical stability regardless of type of osteosynthesis fixation and is therefore a viable method in Vancouver B1 cases. A disadvantage of the cerclage system compared to plating is that an increased subsidence of the short stem was observed.
-
Patients presenting with hip pain but normal plain radiographs may ultimately be shown on further investigation to have suffered an occult hip fracture (OHF). This diagnosis can be made with CT or MRI. Traditionally MRI has been considered a superior modality. We performed a retrospective review of all patients presenting to our service with a suspected OHF over a four-year period, investigated with either CT or MRI. ⋯ Modern imaging technology does not appear to miss clinically significant fractures. As CT is usually more accessible than MRI, the results of our study should encourage surgeons to consider CT as a first line investigation for occult hip fractures. We advocate a high index of suspicion and early imaging referral for elderly patients presenting with non-specific hip pain following a fall. Level 3 Evidence.
-
Smoking is associated with increased complications in fracture care. Smoking cessation has a positive impact on outcomes. It is unknown whether orthopaedic trauma patients understand the ill effects of smoking on fracture care and whether knowledge can improve cessation interest. We hypothesized that (1) smokers less fully understand the negative effects of smoking than do nonsmokers, (2) an increased proportion of orthopaedic trauma patients are further in the process of change to quit smoking, (3) increased knowledge predicts increased readiness to quit, and (4) minimal education through a survey can improve interest in smoking cessation. ⋯ Compared with nonsmokers, smokers less fully understand the negative effects of smoking on fracture care and general health. A large proportion of orthopaedic trauma patients who smoke are interested in smoking cessation and are possibly further along the pathway to change than expected. Brief education through a survey can increase interest in quitting. Formal education intervention may improve cessation rates and fracture outcomes.