Injury
-
Comparative Study
General versus spinal anaesthesia in proximal femoral fracture surgery - treatment outcomes.
Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health problem because of the increasing proportion of elderly individuals in the general population. The mode of choice for anaesthesia in surgical treatment of these fractures is still debated in terms of better postoperative outcome. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of general over spinal anaesthesia on mortality in proximal femoral fracture surgery. ⋯ The results indicate that the mode of anaesthesia (general vs spinal) has no effect on postoperative mortality, and that the mode of anaesthesia should be applied on an individual basis in correlation with associated comorbidities.
-
During surgical management of femoral shaft fractures, difficulties arise when treating patients with narrow femoral diaphyseal canals, such as young patients and those with dysplastic femurs secondary to underlying pathology. Accurate pre-operative assessment of the femoral diaphyseal canal diameter would allow the surgeon to plan surgical technique and ensure appropriate equipment was available, such as narrow, unreamed or paediatric sized nails. ⋯ Accurate knowledge pre-operatively of radiographic measurements is highly valuable to the operating surgeon. This technique can accurately measure femoral canal diameter using the Thomas splint, negates the requirement for a calibration marker, is reproducible, easy to perform, and is indispensible when faced with a patient with a narrow femoral canal in a diaphyseal femoral fracture. (181 words).
-
Appropriate management of ankle syndesmotic instability is needed to prevent the development of complications. Previous biomechanical studies have evaluated movement of the fibula after screw or suture button fixations with different results, most likely being caused by variations in experimental setups that did not mirror the in vivo clinical setting. This study aimed to arthroscopically compare in a cadaveric model the stability of syndesmotic fixation with either a suture button or syndesmotic screw. ⋯ Current fixation methods for syndesmotic disruption maintain coronal plane fibular stability. Screw and suture button constructs, however, respectively resulted in greater or insufficient constraint to fibular motion in the sagittal plane as compared to the intact syndesmotic ligament. These findings suggest that neither traditional screw nor suture button fixations optimally stabilize the syndesmosis, which may have implications for postoperative care and clinical outcomes.
-
Comparative Study
Changes in cortical microarchitecture are independent of areal bone mineral density in patients with fragility fractures.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) are commonly used to assess the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and peripheral microstructure, respectively. While DXA is the standard to diagnose osteoporosis, HR-pQCT provides information about the cortical and trabecular architecture. Many fragility fractures occur in patients who do not meet the osteoporosis criterion (i.e., T-score≤-2.5). ⋯ At the distal tibia, cortical thickness was lower (p<0.001), cortical porosity was similar (p=0.61), trabecular number was higher (p<0.001), and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) was higher (p<0.001) in patients with T-scores≥-2.5 than in patients with T-scores≤-3.5. Trabecular number and BV/TV correlated with T-score (r=0.68, p<0.001; r=0.61, p<0.001), whereas the cortical values did not. Our results thus demonstrate the importance of bone structure, as assessed by HR-pQCT, in addition to the standard DXA T-score in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.