Injury
-
Heterotopic ossification (HO) can form after amputation and may cause pain and functional impairment. We aimed to describe the prevalence of HO in a civilian population of transtibial amputees. We hypothesized that the decreased rate of symptomatic neuroma following active nerve surgery (Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) or Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI)) may subsequently lead to a lower prevalence of HO compared to passive nerve surgery (i.e. traction neurectomy) performed at the time of amputation. ⋯ HO is a common finding in transtibial amputees. Peripheral nerve surgerical techniques that actively address amputated nerve endings to reduce symptomatic neuroma formation may decrease the prevalence of HO.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
An endpoint adjudication committee for the assessment of computed tomography scans in fracture healing.
Endpoint Adjudication Committees (EACs) benefit the quality of randomized control trials (RCTs) where outcomes depend on subjective interpretations. However, assembling a committee to adjudicate large datasets is cumbersome. In a recent RCT, the primary outcome was time to union following operative fixation of scaphoid non-union, with real or placebo adjunctive ultrasound treatment. Union status was determined with computed tomography (CT) scans interpreted by treating surgeons and radiologists. An EAC was established to deliberate discrepancies between radiologists' and surgeons' interpretations of union status. ⋯ This adjudication process provides a valuable research tool for reference by other clinical investigators whose RCTs' outcomes are dependent on interpretation of radiographic images.
-
Infected animal bites and localised infections are traditionally managed by inpatient admission, intravenous antibiotics, and localised washout +/- debridement. Our hand trauma protocol was modified to accommodate the challenges faced in delivering this pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic. ⋯ III.
-
Several concerns regarding gender equality in orthopedic surgery do exists. The aim of this study was to (1) compare operative times, (2) compare mortality rates, (3) investigate gender disparities in hip fracture surgeries, and (4) analyze gender distribution among attending and resident surgeons performing Closed Reduction Internal Fixation (CRIF) and Hemiarthroplasty (HA) METHODS: All patients >75 years old treated for proximal femur fractures in a level-one trauma center in a four-year timeframe were retrospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria were follow-up <3 years, incomplete data, active patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and other surgeries performed during the same anesthesia. Patients were grouped according to procedure: 1) Closed Reduction Internal Fixation (CRIF) and 2) Hemiarthroplasty (HA). Gender and level of expertise (residents or attending surgeon) of leading surgeons (male (M), female (F) and non-binary (NB)) was extracted from medical records. Operative time, mortality rates, and the likelihood of performing either CRIF or HA were compared across genders. ⋯ Despite orthopedics still being a male-dominated field, gender does not affect surgical outcomes or the likelihood of performing CRIF or HA. However, the focus should shift towards improving inclusivity in surgical education and practice by providing equal opportunities and removing social and educational barriers based on gender.
-
The development of national registries from routinely collected health data has transformed the research landscape by improving access to large sample populations. This growing volume of data enables researchers to address critical questions but also challenges clinicians in conducting, evaluating, and applying the research. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), the largest aggregate of deidentified trauma data in the world, is increasingly utilized for retrospective studies on trauma. This scoping review aimed to assess the quality of reporting of NTDB-based orthopedic trauma publications. ⋯ This study highlights the methodological gaps in the NTDB-based orthopedic trauma publications and identifies areas for improvement, including the management of missing data, selection of the study population through data cleaning, identification of sources of bias, and transparency in data accessibility. Future work should test the reproducibility of these studies and evaluate adherence to established guidelines across a broader range of databases and disciplines.