Chest
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Absence of benefit of incentive spirometry in low-risk patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. A controlled randomized study.
To determine the potential benefit of incentive spirometry, which has been advocated to prevent pulmonary complications after upper-abdominal surgery, we compared a group of patients receiving incentive spirometry to another group receiving no specialized postoperative respiratory care. Forty patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists' class 1 and 2 who were undergoing cholecystectomy (through right subcostal incision) were included in the study and were randomly allocated to one of the two groups. ⋯ In particular, deterioration on the chest x-ray film at the fourth postoperative day was observed in eight of 20 patients in the group receiving incentive spirometry and in six of 20 in the control group. Our study confirms the postoperative deterioration of respiratory function after upper-abdominal surgery and demonstrates the lack of therapeutic values of incentive spirometry in these patients at low risk for pulmonary complications.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Lorcainide. A comparative trial with quinidine gluconate in patients with previously untreated ventricular arrhythmias.
The efficacy of a new antiarrhythmic agent, lorcainide, was compared with that of quinidine gluconate in a fixed-dose, randomized, crossover trial. Of 26 previously untreated patients with frequent ventricular ectopic beats documented by 24-hour ambulatory monitoring, 17 completed four weeks of therapy with quinidine and 12 with lorcainide. ⋯ We conclude that in a dose of 100 mg twice or three times daily, lorcainide is as effective as quinidine gluconate, 324 mg three times daily, for the suppression of chronic ventricular arrhythmias. However, the high incidence of adverse reactions experienced with lorcainide make it an unacceptable agent for first-line antiarrhythmic therapy.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of lorcainide and quinidine in the treatment of ventricular ectopy.
Lorcainide, a new type I antiarrhythmic agent, was compared to quinidine in respect to antiarrhythmic efficacy and clinical safety. Thirteen subjects completed an open, randomized, crossover study with analysis of 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and drug blood levels. The QRS and Q-T intervals increased with both lorcainide and quinidine. ⋯ No relationship could be established between drug level and arrhythmia suppression in this small population. Some CNS effects were reported in both groups, but no significant hematologic, chemical, or urinary adverse effects were seen with either drug. Thus, lorcainide compares favorably to quinidine in regard to arrhythmia suppression, but was limited in its clinical utility by CNS side effects.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York.
The Memorial Sloan-Kettering lung cancer screening program was begun in 1974 to evaluate sputum cytology as a supplement to the annual chest x-ray examination for early detection and diagnosis. The 10,040 adult, male cigarette smokers who enrolled were randomly assigned to receive annual chest x-ray examinations only or a dual screen with annual chest x-ray examination and four monthly sputum cytology evaluation. ⋯ The same number of cancers developed in the x-ray screen only group, and were diagnosed at a later date. Despite the delay, survival and mortality were the same, suggesting that the squamous carcinomas detected by cytologic examination alone are very slow growing and tend to remain localized until detectable by x-ray examination.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
High-frequency jet ventilation. A prospective randomized evaluation.
Three hundred nine patients were randomly allocated to two ventilatory protocols; 157 patients were supported with a volume-cycled ventilator (VCV) (Bear Medical BEAR 1) and 152 with a high-frequency jet ventilatory (HFJV) developed at our institution. The two ventilators were compared for safety, reliability, ease of use, and efficacy in maintaining gas exchange. On VCV, end points of therapy were: fractional concentration of oxygen in the inspired gas (FIo2) less than or equal to 0.40; arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) greater than or equal to 70 mm Hg; cardiac index (CI) greater than or equal to 3.5 L/min/sq m; and spontaneous respiratory rate less than or equal to eight breaths per minute. ⋯ Differences were statistically but not clinically significant. On HFJV, oxygenation and ventilation were maintained with lower peak inspiratory pressures and smaller tidal volumes than those required for VCV. This investigation proves that HFJV is a safe and reliable method to provide mechanical support which does not, at this time, offer obvious benefits over VCV.