Chest
-
To assess cardiovascular effects and the oxygenation status of mechanically ventilated patients undergoing protected specimen brushing (PSB) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) under fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB). ⋯ We conclude that PSB and BAL under FOB are well tolerated in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with hemodynamic disturbances requiring inotropic or vasopressor agents (or both); however, a modest impairment in arterial oxygenation was observed after the end of the FOB procedure.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparative evaluation of propofol and midazolam as sedative agents in fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Propofol, a new intravenous sedative agent, was investigated in 41 asthmatic patients undergoing day-case (outpatient) fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The study design was a randomized comparison between propofol and midazolam, which is a well-established intravenous sedative agent. The age, weight, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and lung function of the two groups were not significantly different. ⋯ Alertness scored with the digital symbol substitution test (DSST) returned to prebronchoscopy values in the propofol group at 30 min, DSST score = 35.9 (18.2) vs 13.4 (9.1), in the midazolam group (p < .0001) and was still significantly higher at 90 min-39.4 (17.9) and 23.1 (13.8) (p < 0.01). We conclude that propofol is a useful sedating agent in fiberoptic bronchoscopy with similar efficacy to midazolam but with a faster onset of action and a more rapid recovery. These represent significant advantages for day-case procedures.
-
To determine the individual contributions of variables in the Fick equation to cardiac output, we simultaneously measured oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) and thermodilution cardiac output (Qth) in 28 medical and surgical ICU patients. Patients were intubated and ventilated with the intermittent mandatory ventilation mode. VO2 and VCO2 (averaged over 3 min) were obtained from a metabolic cart. ⋯ None of the above oximetry relationships were substantially altered by use of COoximetry venous oxygen saturations. We conclude that Qth cannot be predicted well solely from VO2, VCO2, or SvO2 nor can changes in Qth be predicted well solely from changes in VO2, VCO2, or SvO2. Of the metabolic variables, changes in VCO2 best predicted changes in Qth.