Chest
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of the esophageal obturator airway and endotracheal intubation in prehospital ventilation during CPR.
The esophageal obturator airway (EOA), esophagogastric tubular airway (EGT) and endotracheal (ET) intubation are compared as they relate to blood gases during CPR. Although statistically better levels of gases are obtained with the endotracheal tube in patients who had an EOA inserted previously, no difference in survival is noted in a separate prospective and retrospective series of patients in whom the devices were used in the field. ⋯ It would appear that patients with a PO2 of less than 60 mm Hg do not tend to survive. The endotracheal tube remains the gold standard, although its universal use is impractical, while the EOA would appear to be an effective alternative and an important airway adjunct in the prehospital phase of CPR.
-
Comparative Study
Intracuff pressures in endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes. Related cuff physical characteristics.
This study compared intracuff pressure (ICP) during mechanical ventilation in a variety of currently used endotracheal (ET) and tracheostomy (trach) tube cuffs and related cuff physical characteristics. Tracheostomy tube physical characteristics were also measured. Variation was observed to exist between "just-seal" inspiratory and end-expiratory intracuff pressure during mechanical ventilation. ⋯ Thin, large-diameter, compliant cuffs generally "just seal" with relatively low ICPs. We recommend use of tracheal airways (endotracheal and tracheostomy) fitted with cuffs that seal in patients with low intracuff pressures. We also recommend nonrigid (soft) thermolabile tracheostomy tubes.
-
To assess the concurrent influence on extravascular lung water (EVLW) content of the intravascular Starling forces, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and the colloid osmotic pressure (COP), we measured EVLW by the thermal green dye technique in 174 patients with and without radiographically defined pulmonary edema; in the former group, patients with cardiac (CPE) and noncardiac (NCPE) causes of pulmonary edema were compared (study A). In 119 patients, EVLW was again measured one to three days later (study B). Patients with CPE demonstrated a significantly lower EVLW (9.3 +/- 3.9 ml/kg) (mean +/- SD) than patients with NCPE (14.5 +/- 4.9 ml/kg; p less than 0.05), despite a higher mean PCWP in the former group (20 +/- 7 mm Hg) than in the latter (12 +/- 6 mm Hg; p less than 0.05). ⋯ In study B the change (delta) in EVLW between the two studies was described as follows: delta EVLW = 0.25 + 0.173 delta PCWP (p less than 0.01) + 0.663 group NCPE (p, not significant) + 0.236 group NCPE X delta PCWP (p less than 0.01). This latter equation indicated that the EVLW content manifested a greater change with concurrent alterations in the PCWP in patients with NCPE than was found in patients with only a hydrostatic influence to EVLW formation. Therefore, NCPE is characterized by a greater measurable thermal green dye EVLW than is observed in CPE at any given PCWP, and the PCWP synergistically influences EVLW accumulation in both CPE and NCPE.
-
Subjective assessment of the respiratory rate and the adequacy of tidal ventilation are the oldest and most widely practiced forms of respiratory monitoring in critically ill patients. Surprisingly, this method of assessment has itself never been evaluated in patients. The estimation of tidal volume in nine patients was performed by full-time intensive care unit (ICU) personnel and compared to the objective measurement of using a calibrated and validated respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP). ⋯ Poor correlation between clinical estimation by ICU personnel and actual measurement by RIP was revealed in all cases. A widespread and potentially dangerous tendency to overestimate tidal volume was noted. These data suggest that subjective assessment of tidal volume is inaccurate in critically ill patients and that the development of techniques of continuous, nonobtrusive and objective monitoring are to be encouraged.