Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEpidural hydromorphone with and without epinephrine for post-operative analgesia after cesarean delivery.
The efficacy of epidural hydromorphone alone or in combination with epinephrine for postoperative analgesia was evaluated in 30 healthy women who underwent cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia. They were assigned randomly to receive either 1.5 mg hydromorphone alone (N = 15) or 1.5 mg hydromorphone with 1/200,000 epinephrine (N = 15). Duration of analgesia (mean +/- SD) was 24.3 +/- 9.4 hours after the epidural injection of hydromorphone plus epinephrine. ⋯ Side effects including pruritus (73%), nausea (20%), and vomiting (15%) were of similar frequency with and without epinephrine. Although mean venous PCO2 (PvCO2) levels three and six hours after the hydromorphone-epinephrine dose were elevated significantly over the pre-drug PvCO2 levels, no respiratory depression was detected by an apnea monitor to which all patients were connected. The addition of epinephrine to epidural hydromorphone hastened onset and prolonged the duration of analgesia after cesarean section.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEpidural butorphanol-bupivacaine for analgesia during labor and delivery.
A double-blind, randomized, dose-response study of a combination of 0.25% bupivacaine combined with 0, 1, 2, or 3 mg of butorphanol was studied in 40 laboring parturients. The optimal dose of butorphanol combined with 8.5 to 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine was 2 mg; with 2 mg, the duration of analgesia was significantly greater and the time to onset of analgesia significantly shorter than when no butorphanol was added, and the amount of bupivacaine could be reduced 50%. ⋯ All neonatal observations were normal. It is concluded that epidural butorphanol can be a useful and safe adjunct to bupivacaine used for epidural analgesia during labor.
-
Intraspinal narcotics have dramatically influenced the way pain of malignant origin is managed. There has been a rapid acceptance of this modality within the anesthesia community to treat a wide variety of cancer pain problems. ⋯ Factors to be considered in patient selection should include the results of the preimplantation spinal narcotic trial, infection trial, infection and local conditions, hematologic status, physiologic and behavioral abnormalities, cost, patient support systems and life expectancy. By interfacing these factors with the unique profiles that each of the five types of implantable narcotic delivery systems offer, improved results both in terms of pain relief and patient satisfaction can be expected.
-
The effects of general and regional anesthesia on neonates after cesarean section have been studied mainly on elective cases. In this paper we studied infants delivered by elective and nonelective cesarean section at the Winnipeg Women's Hospital from 1975 to 1983 (n = 3940) to determine the effect of anesthetic technique on neonatal outcomes. A trained anesthesia nurse interviewed all parturients and reviewed their antepartum, labor and delivery, and anesthesia records. ⋯ Among neonates delivered after elective section, general anesthesia was associated with a higher incidence of low Apgar scores at 1 minute. In neonates delivered by nonelective section, general anesthesia was associated with higher rates of low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes as well as greater requirements for intubation and artificial ventilation. There were no differences seen in neonatal death rates with general and regional anesthesia in the three groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1989
Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine reduces postoperative paralytic ileus after hysterectomy.
This study was undertaken to compare the effects of postoperative bupivacaine epidural analgesia with those of intermittent injections of ketobemidone (a synthetic opioid) on postoperative bowel motility in patients who had had hysterectomies. The epidural group (N = 20) received continuous epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine postoperatively for 26-30 hours and the control group (N = 20) received intermittent injections of ketobemidone for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative bowel movements and propulsive colonic motility were estimated from the first passage of flatus and feces and by following radiopaque markers by serial abdominal radiographs. ⋯ The average position of the markers was significantly more distally in the epidural group immediately after operation and the markers continued to move forward during the first postoperative day. In the control group, the markers did not move during this period. The results demonstrate that postoperative bowel peristalsis returned earlier in the patients given epidural analgesia with bupivacaine for pain relief than in patients given a narcotic.