Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEpidural clonidine enhances postoperative analgesia from a combined low-dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine regimen.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the value of adding clonidine to a low-dose epidural regimen for postoperative pain treatment was assessed. Twenty-four patients scheduled for hysterectomy during combined thoracic epidural (bupivacaine and morphine) and general anesthesia were studied. Postoperative analgesia consisted of epidural bupivacaine (5 mg/h) and morphine (0.1 mg/h) for 12 h. ⋯ We found no significant difference in pain scores at rest between the clonidine and placebo groups but an enhanced analgesic effect by clonidine during cough and mobilization (P less than 0.05). Arterial blood pressure decreased significantly during clonidine infusion and remained lower than in the control group throughout the study. We conclude that a continuous low-dose epidural clonidine infusion enhances analgesia from a combined low-dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine regimen after hysterectomy; however, the concomitant decrease in arterial blood pressure during epidural clonidine deserves further study before such a regimen can be recommended.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparative effects of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl as adjuvants during outpatient anesthesia.
The comparative effects of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl were evaluated in 136 healthy female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopic procedures according to a randomized, double-blind protocol. Patients received ketorolac (60 mg) or dezocine (6 mg) or fentanyl (100 micrograms, control group) before the start of the operation. A standardized general anesthetic technique consisting of midazolam (2 mg), fentanyl (50 micrograms), and propofol (2 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia followed by propofol (120 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), vecuronium (1-2 mg), and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen for maintenance of anesthesia, was used. ⋯ However, 52% of the patients receiving dezocine required antinausea therapy in the postanesthesia care unit, compared with 20% and 18% in the fentanyl and ketorolac groups, respectively. Finally, recovery times were significantly shorter in the ketorolac (vs dezocine) group. Although both ketorolac and dezocine were effective alternatives to fentanyl when administered during outpatient laparoscopy, dezocine was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative nausea and a delayed discharge time compared with ketorolac.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialVomiting after alfentanil anesthesia: effect of dosing method.
This double-blind study correlated the association of nausea and vomiting after alfentanil with its method of administration (bolus dose vs continuous infusion). Of 40 women undergoing lower abdominal gynecologic or laparoscopic surgery, 20 received an intravenous alfentanil (30 micrograms/kg) bolus dose for induction of anesthesia, with subsequent bolus doses of 10 micrograms/kg every 10 min, and 20 received the same induction dose delivered over 1 min, followed by an intravenous infusion at 1.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. ⋯ Laparoscopy and alfentanil infusion combined synergistically to worsen the incidence of nausea and vomiting. We conclude that alfentanil infusion for laparoscopic surgery entails a high risk for nausea and vomiting.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1992
ReviewAn overview of induction and emergence characteristics of desflurane in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients.
A major advantage of desflurane over currently available agents is that the blood-gas partition coefficient of desflurane is 0.42, lower than all available volatile anesthetics, and slightly lower than nitrous oxide. This property predicts rapid induction of and recovery from general anesthesia with desflurane. This review will summarize and compare results of studies that have examined various clinical characteristics of induction and emergence with desflurane in a variety of patient populations. ⋯ Several studies have compared emergence from anesthesia with desflurane with that from isoflurane-based anesthetics, and have demonstrated that initial emergence from a given depth of anesthesia, e.g., time to eye opening or response to verbal commands, is about twice as fast with desflurane. Similar results have been obtained in pediatric patients where emergence from desflurane is faster than that seen from halothane. Emergence from desflurane anesthesia appears similar in time-course to that from propofol-based anesthetics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialLack of interaction between propofol and vecuronium.
We estimated the potency of vecuronium and measured the onset and duration of its action during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol to examine the possibility of any interaction between these two drugs. Propofol infusion was administered according to a three-step dosage scheme, and neuromuscular block was monitored by measuring the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle after single-twitch stimulation of the ulnar nerve at 0.1 Hz. A control group of patients were similarly studied during anesthesia with thiopental, nitrous oxide, oxygen, and fentanyl. ⋯ The onset of action of an 80-micrograms/kg dose (2 x ED95) of vecuronium was 3.6 +/- 1.2 and 4.1 +/- 1.7 min (mean +/- SD), in the propofol (n = 10) and control (n = 10) groups, respectively. The respective times to recovery of the twitch height to 25% of control and the recovery indices (25%-75% recovery of twitch height) in the propofol versus control groups were 28.3 +/- 6.6 and 28.0 +/- 1.7 min and 13.3 +/- 6.8 and 15.4 +/- 11.9 min, respectively. There were no significant differences in any of the measured variables between the propofol and control groups, indicating the lack of any interaction between propofol and vecuronium.