Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSubhypnotic doses of propofol possess direct antiemetic properties.
Propofol is associated with a low incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the possible direct antiemetic properties of a subhypnotic dose of propofol. Fifty-two ASA physical status I or II patients, aged 15-60 yr with nausea and vomiting after minor gynecologic, orthopedic, or digestive tract surgery, were included in the study and received either propofol (10 mg = 1 mL) or placebo (1 mL Intralipid) intravenously in the postanesthesia care unit. ⋯ Hemodynamic values remained unchanged in both groups. Pain on injection (7.6%) or dizziness (3.6%) only occurred in the propofol group. We conclude that propofol has significant direct antiemetic properties.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison between preincisional and postincisional lidocaine infiltration and postoperative pain.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of preincisional and postincisional wound infiltration with 1% lidocaine (40 mL) on the postoperative pain of 37 patients scheduled for elective inguinal herniotomy. The demand for additional postoperative analgesics occurred earlier in those who received lidocaine infiltration after incision (165 min) than in those who received preincisional lidocaine (225 min, P less than 0.05). The preincisional lidocaine infiltration group also had fewer patients requiring supplemental analgesics (58%) than the postincisional group (94%) (P less than 0.05). We conclude that preincisional infiltration of the surgical wound with lidocaine is a more effective method of providing postoperative analgesia than is postincisional infiltration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparative study of transdermal 10% lidocaine gel with and without glycyrrhetinic acid monohemiphthalate disodium for pain reduction at venous cannulation.
The clinical benefits of transdermal 10% lidocaine base gels with and without 3% glycyrrhetinic acid monohemiphthalate disodium (GAMHPh) for reduction of pain at venous cannulation were compared in a randomized, double-blind fashion in 24 surgical patients. After about 60 min of occlusive transdermal application, the mean pinprick pain score (1.3 +/- 1.5) in the GAMHPh group (n = 12), graded by noting the number of painful pinpricks out of five, was significantly less than that (2.5 +/- 1.7) in the control group (n = 12) (P less than 0.05). ⋯ Erythema observed in 8 of the 24 patients was the only adverse local reaction. Addition of 3% GAMHPh to the lidocaine gel is useful in promoting transdermal lidocaine absorption.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Complications occurring in the postanesthesia care unit: a survey.
To identify and quantitate complications occurring in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), a prospective study evaluated 18,473 consecutive patients entering a PACU at a university teaching hospital. Using a standardized collection form, the incidence of intraoperative and PACU complications was determined. The combined PACU and intraoperative complication rate was 26.7%. ⋯ In patients experiencing a major cardiovascular complication, for example, variables associated with a greater risk of developing any PACU complications were ASA physical status (status II), duration of anesthesia (2-4 h), anesthetic technique, emergency procedures, and certain types of surgical procedures (orthopedic or abdominal). For patients admitted with a temperature of less than 35 degrees C the duration of the PACU stay was 152 +/- 46 min compared with 116 +/- 65 min for patients with a temperature greater than or equal to 36 degrees C (P less than 0.01). In conclusion, events occurring during the PACU period continue to be a source of patient morbidity.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Comparative StudyComparison of etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental on function and metabolism of isolated hearts.
The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during atrial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5 microM to 1 mM. ⋯ Between 100 microM and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVo2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVo2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.