Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Comparative StudyComparative electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects of several amide local anesthetic drugs in anesthetized dogs.
Large and equipotent doses of several local anesthetics were administered in a cardiac electrophysiologic model on closed-chest dogs. Five groups of pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were each given intravenously 16 mg/kg lidocaine, 12 mg/kg mepivacaine, 4 mg/kg or 8 mg/kg etidocaine, and 4 mg/kg bupivacaine. Lidocaine induced bradycardia, slowing of atrioventricular node conduction (AH), and marked hemodynamic depression, represented by a decrease in mean aortic pressure (MAoP), in the peak of first derivative of left ventricular pressure (LVdP/dt(max)) and by an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). ⋯ We conclude that mepivacaine induced moderate cardiotoxicity. In contrast, lidocaine induced dramatic hemodynamic depression while etidocaine and bupivacaine markedly impaired both electrophysiologic and hemodynamic variables. This double impairment could explain the great difficulty in resuscitating patients who have had cardiotoxic accidents induced by etidocaine or bupivacaine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients.
A randomized, prospective study was performed at four institutions to compare anesthetic induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics between sevoflurane- and propofol-based anesthesia in 186 ASA physical status I and 11 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures of 1-3 h. Group 1 (n = 93) patients received sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia while Group 2 (n = 93) received propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation times were significantly shorter with propofol (2.21 +/- 0.2 min, 5.11 +/- 0.3 min, respectively) than with sevoflurane (3.11 +/- 0.2 min, 7.21 +/- 0.3 min, respectively). ⋯ The incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain-discomfort scores were similar between the two groups. Urinary specific gravity decreased in the sevoflurane-treated group while serum creatinine and urinary pH were unchanged from preoperative values in both groups. Sevoflurane compared favorably with propofol when used for anesthesia for elective procedures of 1-3 h duration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreoperative oral ondansetron for pediatric tonsillectomy.
This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of preoperative oral ondansetron, 0.075 mg/kg or 0.15 mg/kg, in 136 preadolescent children premedicated with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg per os and dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg intravenously prior to undergoing tonsillectomy with isoflurane anesthesia. The incidence of vomiting during the 24 h after tonsillectomy was significantly reduced (P < 0.04) by ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg compared with placebo and ondansetron 0.075 mg/kg (15%, 38%, and 36%, respectively). ⋯ We conclude that ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg, administered orally prior to tonsillectomy, is associated with reduced postoperative vomiting in preadolescent children. In addition, the preoperative oral administration of ondansetron 0.075 mg/kg is no more effective than placebo in preventing posttonsillectomy vomiting in preadolescent children.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialNaloxone versus nalbuphine infusion for prophylaxis of epidural morphine-induced pruritus.
This randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy of two mu-receptor antagonists, naloxone and nalbuphine, in the prophylactic management of pruritus in postcesarean section patients receiving epidural morphine. Dosages of study drugs were individualized by the use of a patient self-administration (PSA) device. All 51 patients were healthy women who received a uniform epidural anesthetic and epidural morphine (5 mg). ⋯ The potency ratio for naloxone:nalbuphine for antagonism of the pruritic effects of epidural morphine was approximately 40:1. Intervention to treat either unrelieved pruritus or pain, respectively, was necessary in the following numbers of patients: Group A, 0/1; Group B, 1/1; Group C, 2/2. Prophylactic infusions offer the potential for labor cost savings by minimizing the need for episodic therapeutic interventions to treat pruritus.