Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of clonidine premedication on sevoflurane requirements and anesthetic induction time.
We assessed the effects of oral clonidine preanesthetic medication (4.5 microg/kg) on the vital capacity rapid-inhalation anesthetic induction time (VCRII time) and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) to prevent a response to a verbal command in 50% of patients (MAC-Awake) by its hypnotic effect, and on MAC-Skin incision for the analgesic effect in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. We studied 104 adult patients (control group: n = 52, clonidine group: n = 52) aged 30-48 yr scheduled to undergo general anesthesia. Fifty-two patients received oral clonidine 4.5 microg/kg 1.5 h before arrival in the operating room (clonidine group). The patients exhaled to residual volume and took three vital capacity breaths of 5% sevoflurane in oxygen. The VCRII time was defined as the time interval between the initiation of the VCRII and the disappearance of the response to verbal command. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen and air. The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration reached a predetermined value, then the ratio of predetermined ET to inspiratory concentration was maintained at > or =0.95 for at least 15 min before skin incision. After skin incision, the patients were observed for gross purposeful muscular movements. MAC was defined as the average of the cross-over midpoints in each cross-over. After maintaining the ET sevoflurane concentration for 15 min, patients were judged to be awake or asleep. Average times for VCRII using 5% sevoflurane were achieved in 44+/-11 s (mean +/- SD) and 27+/-6 s in the control and clonidine groups, respectively (P = 0.0001). MAC-Awake values of sevoflurane were 0.66%+/-0.03% and 0.35%+/-0.02% (P = 0.0001), and MAC-Skin incision values were 1.97%+/-0.19% and 1.29%+/-0.13% (P = 0.0001) in the control and clonidine groups, respectively. These results suggest that clonidine may have a more potent hypnotic effect than analgesic effect. ⋯ Oral clonidine preanesthetic medication (4.5 microg/kg) significantly reduces vital capacity rapid inhalation anesthetic induction time and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration awake for sevoflurane.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialRopivacaine epidural anesthesia and analgesia versus general anesthesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine in the perioperative management of hip replacement. Ropivacaine Hip Replacement Multicenter Study Group.
The aim of our study was to compare epidural anesthesia and analgesia (EDA) with ropivacaine versus general anesthesia followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (GA/PCA) after hip replacement regarding pain, side effects, and discharge from the postanesthesia care unit. After ethics committee approval, randomization, and informed consent, 90 patients were enrolled. In Group EDA, epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine 10 mg/mL, 15-25 mL) was followed by an epidural infusion (2 mg/mL, 4-6 mL/h for 24 h, plus top-up doses of 6-10 mL for 48 h). GA/PCA patients received general anesthesia (isoflurane/N2O/fentanyl) followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine postoperatively. Pain was assessed by using visual analog scales (0-100 mm) at rest and during physiotherapy. Pain at rest was less in the EDA (n = 43) group than in the GA/PCA (n = 45) group (at 10 h: 11.8+/-12.9 vs. 28.4+/-17.1 [P< 0.001]; at 24 h: 14.3+/-11.7 vs. 24.0+/-17 [P<0.01]; in 48 h: 14.3+/-9.3 vs. 21.1+/-17.4 [P = 0.1]). Whereas EDA patients were deemed ready for discharge from the postanesthesia care unit earlier than GA/PCA patients (5.6+/-8.9 vs. 39.7+/-41.5 min), the actual discharge time was comparable. The median time for first passage of flatus was shorter in the EDA group than in the GA/PCA group (26 vs. 47 h). Nausea and vomiting were more common in the GA/PCA group than in the EDA group (16% vs. 28% and 11% vs. 22%, respectively), whereas hypotension (11% vs. 4%) and bradycardia (14% vs. 2%) were less frequent. Under the conditions of the present study, EDA with ropivacaine provided pain control after hip replacement superior to that provided by IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, particularly during the first 24 h. Both approaches to pain management were equally safe. ⋯ Compared with general anesthesia and postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, epidural anesthesia and analgesia with the new local anesthetic ropivacaine enables patients to be discharged sooner from a postanesthesia care unit and provides superior pain relief during the first 24 h after hip replacement.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparative study of hemodynamic and T-wave criteria for detecting intravascular injection of the test dose (epinephrine) in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults.
This study was designed to determine the efficacy of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and changes in T-wave morphology in detecting intravascular injection of 15 microg of epinephrine (test dose) in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults. In addition, the testing threshold using the T-wave amplitude was derived. Ninety-six healthy patients were randomized to receive end-tidal sevoflurane 0.5%, 1%, or 2% and nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen (n = 32 for each sevoflurane concentration). Each group of patients was further randomized to receive 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine plus 15 microg of epinephrine IV or 3 mL of saline IV (n = 16 each). HR, SBP, and T-wave amplitude were continuously monitored for 5 min after the IV injection of the study drug. None receiving IV saline and 15,15, and 14 patients receiving the IV test dose developed HR increases > or =10 bpm during 0.5%, 1%, and 2% sevoflurane, respectively. No patient receiving saline and all patients receiving the test dose developed SBP increases > or =15 mm Hg. T-wave amplitude decreased by >0.1 mV and by >25% in all patients receiving the IV test dose, and its magnitude was similar regardless of the sevoflurane concentrations. When 0.1-mV and 25% decreases in T-wave amplitude were considered as testing thresholds, 100% sensitivities and specificities were obtained. We conclude that a peak SBP increase > or =15 mm Hg and a decrease in T-wave amplitude > or =0.1 mV and > or =25% are more reliable than a HR increase > or =10 bpm for detecting intravascular injection of epinephrine-containing test dose during sevoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ To determine whether an epidural catheter resides in a blood vessel, a standard test dose containing a local anesthetic and 15 microg of epinephrine is used. We found that, in sevoflurane-anesthetized adult patients, a systolic blood pressure increase > or =15 mm Hg and a decrease in T-wave amplitude > or =0.1 mV and > or =25% in lead II, but not a heart rate increase > or =10 bpm, are reliable indicators for detecting intravascular injection.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialQuality of emergence from anesthesia and incidence of vomiting with remifentanil in a pediatric population.
We conducted a randomized trial to compare the incidence of vomiting and the quality of emergence from anesthesia associated with the use of remifentanil versus a nonopiate. It was expected that remifentanil would provide smoother emergence from anesthesia with a comparably low rate of vomiting. The study sample consisted of 115 pediatric patients undergoing dental restoration and extraction who were randomly assigned to the nonopiate or remifentanil groups based on their hospital admission numbers. The nonopiate patients received sufficient desflurane to prevent movement, typically 7%-9%. The remifentanil group received remifentanil 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and enough desflurane to prevent movement, typically 3.2%-3.6%. A trained postanesthesia care unit nurse, blinded to the anesthetic technique, assessed the quality of emergence and incidence of vomiting. Sixty-three patients received remifentanil and 52 received the nonopiate. The groups were not significantly different in either quality of emergence or incidence of vomiting. Remifentanil provided results comparable to a nonopiate with no increase in emesis. ⋯ A randomized, controlled clinical trial of 115 patients undergoing dental restoration indicated that an anesthetic technique using remifentanil provided quality of emergence comparable to and no greater incidence of vomiting than a nonopiate technique.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA controlled study of transesophageal echocardiography to guide central venous catheter placement in congenital heart surgery patients.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and central venous catheter (CVC) placement are often used during congenital cardiac surgery. Complications of CVC placement include cardiac perforation, inadvertent arterial placement, and erroneous hemodynamic data from unrecognized malposition. In this study, we used a prospective, randomized, controlled design to evaluate the use of TEE to guide depth of insertion and confirm superior vena cava cannulation, and to improve the percentage of correctly placed CVCs and reduce complications of CVC placement. One hundred forty-five patients were studied. Eighty patients were randomized to have subclavian vein insertion, 64 to have internal jugular insertion, and 1 to have external jugular insertion of CVC. TEE-guided CVC placement resulted in 100% correct placement when assessed by preoperative TEE, versus 86% in the control group (72 of 72 vs. 63 of 73; P = 0.01). There was no difference in correct placement between the two groups when assessed by postoperative chest radiograph (81.9% TEE versus 75.3% control; P = not significant). One significant complication, a superior vena cava perforation, occurred in the control group. Time to placement was 9.6 min in the TEE group versus 8.0 min in the control group (P = 0.015). ⋯ Transesophageal echocardiography can be used to guide central venous catheter placement in congenital heart surgery. Central venous catheters that seem to be located high in the right atrium by chest radiograph in these patients are often actually in the superior vena cava and pose little risk of cardiac perforation.