Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPostoperative analgesia with no motor block by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil after total hip replacement.
We assessed the analgesic efficacy of postoperative epidural ropivacaine 0.1% with and without sufentanil 1 microgram/mL in this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study of 30 ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Lumbar epidural block using 0.75% ropivacaine was combined with either propofol sedation or general anesthesia for surgery. After surgery, the epidural infusion was commenced. Fifteen patients in each group received either an epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 microgram/mL sufentanil (R + S) or 0.1% ropivacaine without sufentanil (R) at a rate of 5-9 mL/h. All patients had access to i.v. piritramide via a patient-controlled analgesia device. The R + S group consumed six times less piritramide over a 48-h infusion period than the R group (median 12.7 vs 73.0 mg; P < 0.001). Motor block was negligible for the study duration in both groups. Patient satisfaction was excellent. The incidence of adverse events, such as nausea, was similar. We conclude that a continuous epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine with 1 microgram/mL sufentanil is more effective than ropivacaine alone in treating pain after elective hip replacement without motor block. ⋯ This is the first randomized study comparing the efficacy of the epidural combination of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 microgram/mL versus plain ropivacaine 0.1% in treating pain after hip replacement. We found that ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 1 microgram/mL led to a sixfold reduction in opioid requirements after total hip replacement by producing a negligible motor block.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEarly and late reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium with neostigmine in adults and children.
We investigated the influence of the timing of neostigmine administration on recovery from rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade. Eighty adults and 80 children were randomized to receive 0.45 mg/kg rocuronium or 0.075 mg/kg vecuronium during propofol/fentanyl/N2O anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored by train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and adductor pollicis electromyography. Further randomization was made to control (no neostigmine) or reversal with 0.07 mg/kg neostigmine/0.01 mg/kg glycopyrrolate given 5 min after relaxant, or first twitch (T1) recovery of 1%, 10%, or 25%. Another eight adults and eight children received 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine. At each age, spontaneous recovery of T1 and TOF was similar after rocuronium and vecuronium administration but was more rapid in children (P < 0.05). Spontaneous recovery to TOF0.7 after rocuronium and vecuronium administration in adults was 45.7 +/- 11.5 min and 52.5 +/- 15.6 min; in children, it was 28.8 +/- 7.8 min and 34.6 +/- 9.0 min. Neostigmine accelerated recovery in all reversal groups (P < 0.05) by approximately 40%, but the times from relaxant administration to TOF0.7 were similar and independent of the timing of neostigmine administration. Recovery to T1 90% after succinylcholine was similar in adults (9.4 +/- 5.0 min) and children (8.4 +/- 1.1 min) and was shorter than recovery to TOF0.7 in any reversal group after rocuronium or vecuronium administration. Recovery from rocuronium and vecuronium blockade after neostigmine administration was more rapid in children than in adults. Return of neuromuscular function after reversal was not influenced by the timing of neostigmine administration. These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. ⋯ These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Although spontaneous and neostigmine-assisted recovery is more rapid in children than in adults, in neither is return of function as rapid as after succinylcholine administration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAnalgesia, pruritus, and ventilation exhibit a dose-response relationship in parturients receiving intrathecal fentanyl during labor.
Several studies have characterized the 50% and 95% effective doses (ED50 and ED95, respectively) of intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. Few have investigated these same criteria for the less expensive alternative, fentanyl. In addition, the ventilatory effects of intrathecal fentanyl at clinically relevant doses are unclear. We performed this study to establish the dose-response relationship of intrathecal fentanyl for both analgesia and ventilatory depression. Ninety parturients in active early labor (< or = 5 cm dilation) received intrathecal fentanyl 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, or 25 micrograms in a double-blinded, randomized fashion (n = 15 patients in each group). Parturients were monitored for degree of pain (measured using a 100-mm visual analog pain scale), blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), respiratory rate, ETCO2, and fetal heart rate 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after the administration of intrathecal fentanyl. An absolute visual analog pain scale score < or = 25 mm was defined a priori as analgesic success. The percentage of parturients who achieved analgesic success was used to construct quantal dose-response curves, from which the ED50 and ED95 values were derived for the total population (mixed parity) and the nulliparous and multiparous subpopulations separately. Overall ED50 and ED95 values (95% CI) were 5.5 (3.4-7.2) and 17.4 (13.8-27.1) micrograms, respectively. Nulliparous values were lower (5.3 and 15.9 micrograms, respectively) than multiparous values (6.9 and 26.0 micrograms, respectively) but were within the 95% CIs of the total population. Pruritus incidence in parturients with analgesic success displayed a dose-response relationship identical to that seen for analgesia. ETCO2 displayed a dose-related increase, particularly at doses > or = 15 micrograms, without concomitant changes in respiratory rate or SaO2, which suggests a decrease in tidal volume. Even in the absence of overt signs or symptoms of somnolence, intrathecal fentanyl at doses within the effective analgesic range induced a change in ventilation that may last longer than the 30-min period we studied. ⋯ Intrathecal fentanyl induces rapid and satisfying dose-dependent analgesia in early labor; however, it also produces dose-related decreases in ventilation in the absence of overt somnolence.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPerioperative dextromethorphan reduces postoperative pain after hysterectomy.
We studied the effect of dextromethorphan, an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, on analgesic consumption and pain scoring after abdominal hysterectomy. In this double-blinded study, 50 patients were randomized into two groups. Group DM was given oral dextromethorphan 40 mg with their premedication, then 40 mg three times per day for the next 2 days. Group P received placebo at identical times. Postoperative analgesic requirements were assessed using a patient-controlled analgesia system and subsequent oral analgesic intake using a set protocol. Pain was assessed at rest and on movement using a visual analog scale 4, 24, 48, and 72 h after the operation. Median pain scores at rest were significantly lower at 48 and 72 h and also for the sum of all resting pain scores. Mean morphine consumption was less in Group DM (1.1 vs 1.5 mg/h; P = 0.054). Usage of oral diclofenac, given every 8 h as needed, did not differ between groups, but consumption of codydramol (paracetamol 500 mg and dihydrocodeine 10 mg) was significantly less in Group DM. We conclude that the use of oral dextromethorphan has an analgesia-sparing effect and some beneficial effects on pain scoring at rest after abdominal hysterectomy. ⋯ Patients given dextromethorphan before and after surgery had a significant reduction in some pain scores at rest, but not on movement. There was a trend to lower morphine requirements in the first 24 h. Over the next 48 h, oral analgesic usage was significantly reduced.
-
Anticipated technical difficulty is one factor that can influence the anesthesiologist's decision to perform neuraxial (spinal or epidural) blockade. Problems during the procedure may be associated with patient dissatisfaction, neurologic sequelae, or hematoma. We designed this study of 595 neuraxial blocks to determine whether any patient characteristics would be useful in predicting a difficult neuraxial block. Before the procedure, the following data were noted: demographic data, body habitus (normal, thin, muscular, obese), spinal landmarks (good = easily palpable spinous processes, poor = difficult to palpate spinous processes, none = unable to positively identify spinous processes), and spinal anatomy (assessed by inspection and examination as normal or deformed). We noted the technique, approach, needle type, needle gauge, etc. We also recorded whether the procedure was completed at the first (first-level success) or second spinal level and the total number of new skin punctures (attempts) necessary to complete the procedure. Of all the factors considered, the quality of landmarks best correlated with technical difficulty as measured by both first-level success and number of attempts. Abnormal spinal anatomy correlated with difficulty as measured by number of attempts. Body habitus also correlated with difficulty, but only as measured by number of attempts. There was no association between either measure of difficulty and any of the following: age, sex, spinal versus epidural, approach, needle type, needle gauge, or training level of the provider. Thoracic epidurals were less difficult than lumbar epidurals by both measures of difficulty. We conclude that body habitus does not seem to be the best predictor of technical difficulty. An examination of the patient's back for the quality of landmarks and obvious anatomical deformity better predicts the ease or difficulty of neuraxial block. Other factors seem to have little or no influence on the difficulty of neuraxial block procedures. ⋯ We studied a number of factors, including equipment, technique, and patient characteristics, that may indicate the ease or difficulty of performing neuraxial (spinal and epidural) blocks. Of these factors, only patient characteristics had significant predictive value. We found that an examination of the patient's back for the quality of landmarks and obvious anatomical deformity better predicts the ease or difficulty of neuraxial block than does body habitus.