Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPerioperative dextromethorphan reduces postoperative pain after hysterectomy.
We studied the effect of dextromethorphan, an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, on analgesic consumption and pain scoring after abdominal hysterectomy. In this double-blinded study, 50 patients were randomized into two groups. Group DM was given oral dextromethorphan 40 mg with their premedication, then 40 mg three times per day for the next 2 days. Group P received placebo at identical times. Postoperative analgesic requirements were assessed using a patient-controlled analgesia system and subsequent oral analgesic intake using a set protocol. Pain was assessed at rest and on movement using a visual analog scale 4, 24, 48, and 72 h after the operation. Median pain scores at rest were significantly lower at 48 and 72 h and also for the sum of all resting pain scores. Mean morphine consumption was less in Group DM (1.1 vs 1.5 mg/h; P = 0.054). Usage of oral diclofenac, given every 8 h as needed, did not differ between groups, but consumption of codydramol (paracetamol 500 mg and dihydrocodeine 10 mg) was significantly less in Group DM. We conclude that the use of oral dextromethorphan has an analgesia-sparing effect and some beneficial effects on pain scoring at rest after abdominal hysterectomy. ⋯ Patients given dextromethorphan before and after surgery had a significant reduction in some pain scores at rest, but not on movement. There was a trend to lower morphine requirements in the first 24 h. Over the next 48 h, oral analgesic usage was significantly reduced.
-
Anticipated technical difficulty is one factor that can influence the anesthesiologist's decision to perform neuraxial (spinal or epidural) blockade. Problems during the procedure may be associated with patient dissatisfaction, neurologic sequelae, or hematoma. We designed this study of 595 neuraxial blocks to determine whether any patient characteristics would be useful in predicting a difficult neuraxial block. Before the procedure, the following data were noted: demographic data, body habitus (normal, thin, muscular, obese), spinal landmarks (good = easily palpable spinous processes, poor = difficult to palpate spinous processes, none = unable to positively identify spinous processes), and spinal anatomy (assessed by inspection and examination as normal or deformed). We noted the technique, approach, needle type, needle gauge, etc. We also recorded whether the procedure was completed at the first (first-level success) or second spinal level and the total number of new skin punctures (attempts) necessary to complete the procedure. Of all the factors considered, the quality of landmarks best correlated with technical difficulty as measured by both first-level success and number of attempts. Abnormal spinal anatomy correlated with difficulty as measured by number of attempts. Body habitus also correlated with difficulty, but only as measured by number of attempts. There was no association between either measure of difficulty and any of the following: age, sex, spinal versus epidural, approach, needle type, needle gauge, or training level of the provider. Thoracic epidurals were less difficult than lumbar epidurals by both measures of difficulty. We conclude that body habitus does not seem to be the best predictor of technical difficulty. An examination of the patient's back for the quality of landmarks and obvious anatomical deformity better predicts the ease or difficulty of neuraxial block. Other factors seem to have little or no influence on the difficulty of neuraxial block procedures. ⋯ We studied a number of factors, including equipment, technique, and patient characteristics, that may indicate the ease or difficulty of performing neuraxial (spinal and epidural) blocks. Of these factors, only patient characteristics had significant predictive value. We found that an examination of the patient's back for the quality of landmarks and obvious anatomical deformity better predicts the ease or difficulty of neuraxial block than does body habitus.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Ventilatory response to CO2 in children with obstructive sleep apnea from adenotonsillar hypertrophy.
We measured the ventilatory response to CO2 as an indicator of respiratory control dysfunction in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) scheduled for adenotonsillectomy. Measurements were performed in unpremedicated children via an endotracheal tube under 0.4%-0.5% end-tidal halothane anesthesia. Mean ventilatory CO2 response slopes for 11 children with OSA requiring adenotonsillectomy (Group I) were compared with those for 14 children without OSA requiring adenotonsillectomy (Group II) and 15 children without OSA requiring nonairway surgery (Group III). The mean ventilatory slope corrected for body surface area for Groups I, II, and III were 539 +/- 338, 828 +/- 234, and 850 +/- 380 mL.min-1.mm Hg ETCO2(-1).m-2, respectively (P < 0.05, Group I versus Groups II and III). Historical data--including snoring, apneic episodes > 10 s, daytime hypersomnolence, and nocturnal enuresis--defined those with OSA. Obesity occurred more frequently in patients with OSA and with depressed ventilatory responses (P < 0.001). Children with OSA from adenotonsillar hypertrophy have a diminished ventilatory response to CO2 stimulation, compared with those without OSA symptoms. The depressed response may account, in part, for the reported increased risk of perioperative respiratory complications in this population. ⋯ Children with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing adenotonsillar surgery are at risk of postoperative respiratory compromise. We found that patients with a clinical history suggesting obstructive sleep apnea have a diminished ventilatory response to CO2 rebreathing, compared with controls.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Assessing the relative quality of anesthesiology and critical care medicine Internet mailing lists.
We studied the relative quality of a subset of anesthesiology and critical care medicine Internet mailing lists regarding the publishing capacity of their members to compare them with the major journals and conferences regarding these specialties. Using systematic searches on MEDLINE and according to the Science Citation Index 1995, we investigated the impact factor of mailing list subscribers, of the first authors of the selected articles, and of the first authors of published abstracts from conferences. We studied six mailing lists, seven journals, and four conferences. Journals and conferences showed a higher percentage of published authors and higher average impact factor among their first authors than the mailing lists did per subscriber. However, when only the subset of publishing authors from the three media was considered, no significant differences were found. We conclude that qualified authors may be found among the subscribers of Internet medical mailing lists on anesthesiology and critical care medicine. These professional discussion groups could complement peer-reviewed publications and conferences in professional information exchange and continuing medical education. ⋯ Internet publishing is not governed by rules that assure certain basic quality standards. Methods for assessing these standards are needed. We compared discussion groups with medical journals and conferences on anesthesiology and critical care medicine by calculating the impact factor of their members and first authors, respectively. Our study shows that qualified authors may be found in all three media.